Putting the 'role' back in role-playing games since 2002.
Donate to Codex
Good Old Games
  • Welcome to rpgcodex.net, a site dedicated to discussing computer based role-playing games in a free and open fashion. We're less strict than other forums, but please refer to the rules.

    "This message is awaiting moderator approval": All new users must pass through our moderation queue before they will be able to post normally. Until your account has "passed" your posts will only be visible to yourself (and moderators) until they are approved. Give us a week to get around to approving / deleting / ignoring your mundane opinion on crap before hassling us about it. Once you have passed the moderation period (think of it as a test), you will be able to post normally, just like all the other retards.

South Park: The Stick of Truth (PRE-RELEASE DISCUSSION)

IronicNeurotic

Arbiter
Joined
Dec 2, 2010
Messages
1,110
All major news sites cite THQ being the publisher of South Park RPG so far..
I think what he means is that the game is not beeing funded by THQ or at least that THQ doesn't have the rights. The game has a really high chance of coming out as Matt and Trey put so much work already into it. If THQ doesn't work out they will just look for another way.
 

Jaesun

Fabulous Ex-Moderator
Patron
Joined
May 14, 2004
Messages
37,433
Location
Seattle, WA USA
MCA Dead State Divinity: Original Sin Project: Eternity Torment: Tides of Numenera Shadorwun: Hong Kong Divinity: Original Sin 2 BattleTech

Jaesun

Fabulous Ex-Moderator
Patron
Joined
May 14, 2004
Messages
37,433
Location
Seattle, WA USA
MCA Dead State Divinity: Original Sin Project: Eternity Torment: Tides of Numenera Shadorwun: Hong Kong Divinity: Original Sin 2 BattleTech
The question is, are they allowed to continue to work on this, during this "hold" or not (like SEGA did not allow them to with AP when it was delayed).
 

Stinger

Arcane
Joined
Aug 13, 2011
Messages
1,366
Sega are a bunch of fucking idiots who screwed up AP by releasing it after ME2 and around the same time as Splinter Cell Conviction. Delaying it for 6 months for marketting and then proceeding to not market it is incredibly stupid.

I doubt THQ/Viacom are stupid enough to delay the game for any reason other than more devtime to finish and polish the game.
 

Jaesun

Fabulous Ex-Moderator
Patron
Joined
May 14, 2004
Messages
37,433
Location
Seattle, WA USA
MCA Dead State Divinity: Original Sin Project: Eternity Torment: Tides of Numenera Shadorwun: Hong Kong Divinity: Original Sin 2 BattleTech
Sega are a bunch of fucking idiots who cancelled the only decent cRPG Obsidian was ever able to design under the fucking shitty Developer/Publisher model Aliens: Crucible. They need to fucking burn in fucking hell for that. BURN IN HELL! And then the fucking faggots screwed up AP by releasing it after ME2 and around the same time as Splinter Cell Conviction. Delaying it for 6 months for marketting and not paying them to continue and polish it, then proceeding to not market it is incredibly stupid.

Fixed and :salute:

I doubt THQ/Viacom are stupid enough to delay the game for any reason other than more devtime to finish and polish the game.

Does anyone have an actual example when a Publisher actually does something smart? I can't think of one instance. I doubt Viacom are any different. And IIRC they have published other terrible games before. They only look at the bottom line. Not the game.
 

Stinger

Arcane
Joined
Aug 13, 2011
Messages
1,366
Square Enix said they delayed DXHR and DS3's release by a few months to improve the devtime and polish.

DS3 only got an extra month so I think it was just for bugfixing but I think DXHR got around 3 months extra.

If it wasn't for extra content then it would've been for QA testing which is still a good thing.
 

thesoup

Arcane
Joined
Oct 13, 2011
Messages
7,599
DXHR got like 5 months. Was supposed to come out in March, but instead it came out in August. And yeah, they said it was for polishing the game, though the release date of some other games probably also had something to do with that. Was not a dumbass move at all.
 

Stinger

Arcane
Joined
Aug 13, 2011
Messages
1,366
though the release date of some other games probably also had something to do with that.

Ah that's right, at DS3's initial launch date it would've been coming out with high profile titles like LA Noire. Quite smart of SquEnix to carefully place their games outside of release windows of higher profile titles.
 

toro

Arcane
Vatnik
Joined
Apr 14, 2009
Messages
14,817
... BURN IN HELL! And then the fucking faggots screwed up AP by releasing it after ME2 and around the same time as Splinter Cell Conviction. ...

A real fag hatting faggots. Now I've seen everything. Time to check out :)
 

Roguey

Codex Staff
Staff Member
Sawyerite
Joined
May 29, 2010
Messages
36,745
Sega are a bunch of fucking idiots who cancelled the only decent cRPG Obsidian was ever able to design under the fucking shitty Developer/Publisher model Aliens: Crucible. They need to fucking burn in fucking hell for that. BURN IN HELL! And then the fucking faggots screwed up AP by releasing it after ME2 and around the same time as Splinter Cell Conviction. Delaying it for 6 months for marketting and not paying them to continue and polish it, then proceeding to not market it is incredibly stupid.

Fixed and :salute:
On his formspring George Ziets said that Aliens was not in a "good place" when he returned from his Zenimax hiatus. Perhaps Sega was partially to blame for that, perhaps not. Anyway it freed up Obsidian to work on their Fallout 3 spin-off so I'm sure it wasn't a big loss for them, Avellone even said it was a good thing overall.

Also it's totally easy to fall in love with hypotheticals. Never a chance of disappointment.
 

DragoFireheart

all caps, rainbow colors, SOMETHING.
Joined
Jun 16, 2007
Messages
23,731
Seems like the programmers at OE are usually shitty on release for any game they touch. I don't know what their problem is, but they better polish South Park so it isn't a glitchy mess. If they need to take longer than FUCKING take longer, don't use me as a beta tester.

Anyways, does anyone think this game will tank?
 

IronicNeurotic

Arbiter
Joined
Dec 2, 2010
Messages
1,110
Seems like the programmers at OE are usually shitty on release for any game they touch. I don't know what their problem is, but they better polish South Park so it isn't a glitchy mess. If they need to take longer than FUCKING take longer, don't use me as a beta tester.

Anyways, does anyone think this game will tank?

DSIII wasn't buggy. This won't be too.

That will depend how much Matt and Trey will rally their fans.
 

joeydohn

Savant
Joined
Apr 18, 2012
Messages
344
The debut trailer for the game has been released

http://uk.ign.com/articles/2012/06/04/e3-2012-south-park-the-stick-of-truth-revealed

Suprisingly the trailer looks good

Also Jesus with a machine gun

I'm guessing the game has an isometric view in the world (school on fire at the beginning) and final fantasy combat. Perhaps they'll have C&C and lots of RPG character progression. It really does look like South Park: The Game rather than a game loosely based on South Park though, I guess that's good for fans.
 

Jaesun

Fabulous Ex-Moderator
Patron
Joined
May 14, 2004
Messages
37,433
Location
Seattle, WA USA
MCA Dead State Divinity: Original Sin Project: Eternity Torment: Tides of Numenera Shadorwun: Hong Kong Divinity: Original Sin 2 BattleTech
It has Mr. Slave?

Will pre-order right now.
 

As an Amazon Associate, rpgcodex.net earns from qualifying purchases.
Back
Top Bottom