I think this game looks great. I also think it won't sell well in the West so the price should drop pretty quick a la Lost Planet 2.
I was about to start a thread too asking if some of the NA codexers have it already.
After watching the video there, i am thinking definitively incline , lifiting a guard levitating on a roof and throwing him down, nothing can go wrong .
Clearly a monster hunter feel as well there.
I found only one review but i dont thin it has much credibility, http://www.jeuxvideo.com/articles/0001/00017004-dragon-s-dogma-test.htm, 14/20 , thats not very good , but that site gives score according to the bribe they receive nowadays, 18/20 diablo 3 18/20 skyrim (+ a special top 10 best rpgs of the history with skyrim on top right when it released)
I had a tough time with the cave under the starting village too. I found it helped to have two mages in my group so we could keep hitting them with either fire-, ice-, or lightning-enchanted weapons. Ice and lightning work really well since the creatures hang out in the water. Fire works pretty well because it causes them to start rolling on their backs in the water, exposing their soft underbelly. Also, be careful about jumping in the water, which will cause your lantern to go out (side note: the way the game handles light and darkness is fucking awesome. You know how we always whine about games like Skyrim not having dark enough dungeons? Dragon's Dogma totally understands how to make a dark cave scary). Finally, make sure you're rolling with some current-level pawns to make your life easier.
Crooked Bee (I think) merged the other thread with this one.And why is it back in general gaming again?....
Who says publishers can't buy bad reviews (for games that aren't theirs). Could easily see Blizzard or Bethesda or any major company really doing that. Especially if they're name dropping other games in the review. A good review doesn't mean much these days, but being mentioned as the better version of something in a bad review is probably worth a lot.I can get giving a bad game a good score because of the hype or publishers buying reviews, but what is the thought process behind shitting on a quality game?
Is there exclusive content on the Xbox 360 version? I think I recall reading that.
Criticism means nothing without details. HOW is the hitbox shit?