oldbonebrown
Arcane
Who did the deed? Who put put him down? Which mod banned him?
Uppity drunkard had it coming.
Uppity drunkard had it coming.
Doesn't even qualify as doxing because it didn't happen in public.
Well people begin wonder about that shit when you ban only right wing people....Remember, this entire shitstorm is happening because I banned Kalin for a measly week for shitposting with my name in a news thread (and this after he deliberately antagonized me for weeks with no response on my end).
Maybe, just maybe, folks shouldn't turn every moderation incident on this forum into THE ULTIMATE FINAL BATTLE FOR FREE SPEECH AGAINST THE KIKES?
If someone other than a Codex moderator or administrator
I never thought the day would arrive when I would agree with a commie but you are alright. Free market radicalism and might makes right is the way. The staff can doxx anyone they can get hold of the info of. Personal responsibility lies with the internet user to maintain his anonymity. So invest in a VPN, I don't have any promo codes but they all have summer sales right now.Temporary bans, gerey. And DU can do whatever he pleases with the 'dex since he owns it.
Speaking of that, mods (or at least administrators) also have access to user PMs since they're cached by the website.So is it ok to doxx people as long as it's limited to a private area?
Like, say I made a private conversation that included every person on the site sans the mods.
"A few others" - and by that you mean literally anyone else that becomes a mod in the future. They can all just go look up the personal information of any user that donated and inform people IRL
You shared personal information that you had no right to have access to.
I'm certain Infinitron had no intention of "doxxing" anyone.
Only losers don't have anything to lose by having their info leaked. Stop being a loser and get yourself a VPN when you have started winning.Simply put? I don't give a fuck. I know that they have my data. They wanna doxx me? There aint shit I can do about it.And give them more leeway to hide this kind of shit from us?Just remove the shoutbox. The regulars will move to Discord. Problem solved.
Informing the public about obvious thing.I'm certain Infinitron had no intention of "doxxing" anyone.
How am I supposed to interpret this here then? Is Infinitron just being a swell and friendly guy and reminding us that he has access to this kind of information?
How am I supposed to interpret this here then? Is Infinitron just being a swell and friendly guy and reminding us that he has access to this kind of information?
I think we might need to rely on opinions from people more level-headed than you are, gayrey.
Der ewigeI think we might need to rely on opinions from people more level-headed than you are, gayrey.
LoL getting owned by rusty......buahahahah lol.I think we might need to rely on opinions from people more level-headed than you are, gayrey.
Or, you know, I stand for what I type. I don't come here and try to act like an edgelord.Only losers don't have anything to lose by having their info leaked. Stop being a loser and get yourself a VPN when you have started winning.Simply put? I don't give a fuck. I know that they have my data. They wanna doxx me? There aint shit I can do about it.And give them more leeway to hide this kind of shit from us?Just remove the shoutbox. The regulars will move to Discord. Problem solved.
I'm certain Infinitron had no intention of "doxxing" anyone.
How am I supposed to interpret this here then? Is Infinitron just being a swell and friendly guy and reminding us that he has access to this kind of information?
DU gives the impression he doesn't give a shit about these serious aspects (data privacy laws, etc).If someone other than a Codex moderator or administrator
Is this within lawful processing as deemed by law? What is the rationale of sharing that data if it doesn't serve any purpose as quoted within lawful processing realms[transaction processing, payment, taxes, or other state mandated activities]?
Are moderators employees of the company that accept the payments, ie. greg martin enterprise? If not that's a breech of law for sure.
DU gives the impression he doesn't give a shit about these serious aspects (data privacy laws, etc).If someone other than a Codex moderator or administrator
Is this within lawful processing as deemed by law? What is the rationale of sharing that data if it doesn't serve any purpose as quoted within lawful processing realms[transaction processing, payment, taxes, or other state mandated activities]?
Are moderators employees of the company that accept the payments, ie. greg martin enterprise? If not that's a breech of law for sure.
Hmm yet i haven't noticed anyone actually losing them or getting scammed in real life. Clearly the security must be ok if nobody had ended up whining how he owns 150k because he ordered three containers with toilet paper from india.DU gives the impression he doesn't give a shit about these serious aspects (data privacy laws, etc).If someone other than a Codex moderator or administrator
Is this within lawful processing as deemed by law? What is the rationale of sharing that data if it doesn't serve any purpose as quoted within lawful processing realms[transaction processing, payment, taxes, or other state mandated activities]?
Are moderators employees of the company that accept the payments, ie. greg martin enterprise? If not that's a breech of law for sure.
Bored ? Then add this disclaimer on front page , and enjoy the butthurt:To be honest, I'm still thinking about it. I might let it ride a few days while I see what drama transpires, then see what happens.Well I see by your reply that you at least somewhat agree with me.
Mostly because I'm bored.