What happened to Kalin

[Stavrophore]

If it's fair for us to "gossip" about users in the Admin forum and post personal, completely non-related-to-their-Codex-activities info therein

I do not think that it is fair, but it is what it is. A law that cannot be enforced is no law and DU can't police you for gossiping outside the forums even if he wanted to. I do find it ethically questionable to have tabs on random users, but even other users with no administrative privileges can do that with the information available on the general forums. As long as the admins do not divulge data that they've obtained through their forum privileges to those who do not have direct access to the same information, then it's as fair as it can get in this regard. Infy wasn't spreading that info in the general forums. He just shared it with those who could've reached it by themselves were they so inclined.

The payment data should be only available to a person who process the payment, ie. owner of the Greg Martin enterprise, his accountant or the employees of the company who are responsible for handling this data for payment, tax and other state mandated activities. So only DU, not Crispy, infinitron or Roguey, Roxor or who else.

 

[Ol' Willy]

I do find it ethically questionable to have tabs on random users

Said commie

 

[Heroic Liberator]

I do find it ethically questionable to have tabs on random users

Said commie

 

[rusty_shackleford]

take your autistic commie/nazi/jew shit to a different thread

 

[BING XI LAO]

Correct me if I'm wrong but wasn't Kalin only using the Jew's first name? rather less info than posted about Luckmann, good thing that forum's private.... oh.

 

[fantadomat]

take your autistic commie/nazi/jew shit to a different thread

Take your libtardian kwanza garbage out of this thread too!

 

[Lagole Gon]

Oookay... it was funny when Maxie got banned. But now it's getting out of control.

Maybe NOW we can just all get along?

 

[DarkUnderlord]

To be fair, we've always had rats in the admin forum.

 

[Crispy]

Well I see by your reply that you at least somewhat agree with me.

 

[gerey]

So when are Infinitron and his merry band getting banned for doxxing?

Fair's fair, right?

 

[Heroic Liberator]

Correct me if I'm wrong but wasn't Kalin only using the Jew's first name? rather less info than posted about Luckmann, good thing that forum's private.... oh.

As such, if you post the real names, images, address or other details of anyone (be they a member of this forum or not) without their permission, we will remove it if it's been requested we do so, or if we think it crosses a line. This includes instances where we have had requests from non-members who have found images and other details of themselves posted on the Codex - in the case of such requests, those details will be removed.

In the case of Infy's name, this applies. In the case of Luckmann, the information remained among those that would've had access to it anyway by virtue of the personal data available to them. We know what they know *about*, but we don't know the contents of Luckmann's doxx.

 

[Stavrophore]

virtue of the personal data available to them

I thought it was standard practice in an enterprise run by adults that you don't share such data to all your employees.
Does amazon grunt working in warehouse knows that you order that big commie dildo and karl marx manifesto in hard cover anniversary edition? Nope, because people who process payments don't share that data to other workers, moreover they are legally bound to not share such data.

 

[gerey]

We know what they know *about*, but we don't know the contents of Luckmann's doxx.

Oh, so it's okay to doxx users (ones that supported the Codex no less), if it's only shared among a few chosen and privileged individuals? I thought the offense here was sharing personal information about an individual, without consent, to other people - but apparently the real crime is how you actually do it?

And as others have said, why the fuck would anyone but DU have access to personal information users submitted while donating to the site?

 

[good fucking shit happen]

Ahhh so this is why they said they don't plan other payments methods, when i mentioned anonymous payments/cryptos.

Hey hey people. I'm taking a break from my very fruitful vacation because I heard someone cry out from the distant west. What was the cry? The Donut was right again.

DarkUnderlord Saint_Proverbius maybe get a handle on your lapdogs

Usually I'm shilling steam games or GOG sales but this time the sale does itself. If you do not want your data being shared and sold then your only choice is to get a VPN provider. Without a VPN everything you ever have said online can and will be used against you for one reason or another. If you want to continue to use the Codex without being blackmailed you have a couple of options.

The first is to go with the cheapskate and crappy alternative: start using TOR. Now now now, I know you got cash to splurge since the users on the Codex tend to be of more than average intelligence, have decent jobs and with money to spend on hobbies. So you want the premium service. Here are two companies I recommend.

https://protonvpn.com/

Proton has a good privacy record and you can try out their service for free for a while. Swiss based and anonymous pilled. They also have a very good mail service that I also recommend. So spend some money on yourself and your internet privacy. Get the plus package and VPN all of your family. A Swiss VPN, a Swiss bank account and a Swiss watch, that's the minimum measure of success.

Another decent but more sketchy company is NordVPN. They have cheaper pricing and the two year package is a steal and you get three extra months. For the cost of a brand new video game you can make sure nobody is spying on you online for two whole years.

https://nordvpn.com/

Included in this shill package is some free privacy advice: never donate to anything. They don't want your money, they want your data. The more important you are the more important it is to never donate and keep your private information safe. YOU, yes, you, are important since you're still reading this post. Stay safe and invest in a VPN subscription or make one yourself if you are savvy enough. Wear a rubber when fucking whores, use a VPN while fucking the net.

That's right, to pour one out for the great free enterprise prophet McAfee I will also give a shoutout to TunnelBear, a VPN provider his company acquired. RIP big guy, you will be missed.

 

[Heroic Liberator]

And as others have said, why the fuck would anyone but DU have access to personal information users submitted while donating to the site?

They shouldn't, but that's not how it currently is. And there was no doxxing in this regard since all of them had access to Luckmann's data and could've googled his name, email or whatever and found that Antifa site with his info on it.

Anyhow, the administration can defend itself.

 

[good fucking shit happen]

We know what they know *about*, but we don't know the contents of Luckmann's doxx.

Oh, so it's okay to doxx users (ones that supported the Codex no less), if it's only shared among a few chosen and privileged individuals? I thought the offense here was sharing personal information about an individual, without consent, to other people - but apparently the real crime is how you actually do it?

And as others have said, why the fuck would anyone but DU have access to personal information users submitted while donating to the site?

If you're stupid enough to give this site your money you deserve to get doxxed.

 

[DarkUnderlord]

Well I see by your reply that you at least somewhat agree with me.

To be honest, I'm still thinking about it. I might let it ride a few days while I see what drama transpires, then see what happens.

Mostly because I'm bored.

 

[Crispy]

big commie dildo and karl marx manifesto in hard cover anniversary edition

We won't tell anyone what you bought.

 

[Broseph]

Correct me if I'm wrong but wasn't Kalin only using the Jew's first name? rather less info than posted about Luckmann, good thing that forum's private.... oh.

As such, if you post the real names, images, address or other details of anyone (be they a member of this forum or not) without their permission, we will remove it if it's been requested we do so, or if we think it crosses a line. This includes instances where we have had requests from non-members who have found images and other details of themselves posted on the Codex - in the case of such requests, those details will be removed.

In the case of Infy's name, this applies. In the case of Luckmann, the information remained among those that would've had access to it anyway by virtue of the personal data available to them. We know what they know *about*, but we don't know the contents of Luckmann's doxx.

So who is the fat Nazi Mario guy if not him?

 

[The_Mask]

For posterity: patch 5 of Baldur's Gate 3 was just a few hours ago. Just so future generations can place this in a timeline properly.

 

[gerey]

Anyhow, the administration can defend itself.

They can't. They've banned 10+ people for doxxing while guilty of doing the same.

You can change the wording however you like, they abused their privileges to doxx one of the users while berating members of the userbase for the same behavior. Doesn't matter if it was done in a private forum only admins have access to. Any one of them could threaten the user with that information in the future, any future member of the administration can gain access to that information and do the same.

I will ask again, why are the perpetrators among the administration not banned? Are the admins going to threaten to doxx any user that says something they don't like in the future?

 

[Heroic Liberator]

Temporary bans, gerey. And DU can do whatever he pleases with the 'dex since he owns it.

And no 'crime' was perpetrated among those with access to the admin forum as far as I'm concerned, but the administration can defend itself.

 

[HeroMarine]

Correct me if I'm wrong but wasn't Kalin only using the Jew's first name? rather less info than posted about Luckmann, good thing that forum's private.... oh.

As such, if you post the real names, images, address or other details of anyone (be they a member of this forum or not) without their permission, we will remove it if it's been requested we do so, or if we think it crosses a line. This includes instances where we have had requests from non-members who have found images and other details of themselves posted on the Codex - in the case of such requests, those details will be removed.

In the case of Infy's name, this applies. In the case of Luckmann, the information remained among those that would've had access to it anyway by virtue of the personal data available to them. We know what they know *about*, but we don't know the contents of Luckmann's doxx.

So who is the fat Nazi Mario guy if not him?

Bob Chipman, of course.

 

[IDtenT]

virtue of the personal data available to them

I thought it was standard practice in an enterprise run by adults that you don't share such data to all your employees.
Does amazon grunt working in warehouse knows that you order that big commie dildo and karl marx manifesto in hard cover anniversary edition? Nope, because people who process payments don't share that data to other workers, moreover they are legally bound to not share such data.

You're arguing with a commie.

 

[BING XI LAO]

Correct me if I'm wrong but wasn't Kalin only using the Jew's first name? rather less info than posted about Luckmann, good thing that forum's private.... oh.

As such, if you post the real names, images, address or other details of anyone (be they a member of this forum or not) without their permission, we will remove it if it's been requested we do so, or if we think it crosses a line. This includes instances where we have had requests from non-members who have found images and other details of themselves posted on the Codex - in the case of such requests, those details will be removed.

In the case of Infy's name, this applies. In the case of Luckmann, the information remained among those that would've had access to it anyway by virtue of the personal data available to them. We know what they know *about*, but we don't know the contents of Luckmann's doxx.

cuck
(I had to type this because the kike took my buttons)