BruceVC
Arcane
Yes thats what I mean and Im surprised luj1 doesn't seem to understand this?Its too early to assess if Avowed will be a success or failure but that will ultimately be determined by its sales and revenue generated
This is the kind of people who ruined game forums and markets, because they bring stupidity and decline
According to you, Van Gogh and Gaugin, Modigliani, John Cassavetes in film, Orson Welles and Tarkovsky, are all failures.
You should think this over whilst exiled to work in a coal mine for a few decades, without parole...
His point is that now that they are part of MS they can't make games that sell enough to have money for next game. They need to get that ROI up or they will be hacked to pieces by corporate MS.
Investors think on that this way:
I can invest 100 milion into Avoved and get 15% return.
or
I can invest 100 milion into spinning wheel toy to get 40% return.
That's how corporate works. They have shareholders not owners and they need ROI, and not just any ROI but high return. Either you do that or your are out.
The moment any gaming studio is no longer independent there is an expectation around sales revenue that needs to be generated, this is what you call ROI
And its not unreasonable because thats how all business works, you have to make money to be sustainable
Its not the same as works of art like Van Gogh which became popular after his death because the art wasnt created through an ownership model or ROI expectation like Obsidian exists under now
So my point stands and should be easy to understand, the overall sales figures around revenue generation will determine the real " success " of Avowed because that will determine if the company will still exist