I'm curious about the Storyfag to Gameplayfag ratio on the Codex.
Storyfag: Your focus and criticism tends to be directed at the story, setting, characters, art, soundtrack, etc - the creative side. You'll be more likely to complain about the story or the setting over combat mechanics or the loot system.
Gameplayfag: Your focus and criticism tends to be directed at the rules and/or methods designed for interaction with the game - the mechanical side. You'll be more likely to complain about balance or combat mechanics over the story or the setting.
Even if you prefer a balance between the two please pick the one you're leaning towards the most.
I've always recognized the story-based games and disliked them as far back as I can remember.
The first PC games I started playing were in HS. They were mostly military simulation games. I went on to play Myst and Privateer and Master of Orion 1/2 and Daggerfall and some strategy games like Conquest of the New World and Sim City 2000. Story-based games, by and large, are linear in how you play. Teh gameplay is only there to drive the narrative forward, so it makes sense it's straightforward and otherwise lightweight, don't it? Not trying to be offensive.
Sometimes I wonder why I like what I like. The earliest games I played were all console games on Sega, Nintendo, TurboGraphics and Atari 2600. They were all action and twitch oriented, except Gunboat for TurboGraphics. That's where I started to get interested in military simulations. Gunboat was very simulation-ish, but I poorly understood it. From there I experiment with things like JetFighter II, M1 Tank Platoon, Wolfpack, Red Baron and a few others all through HS. In later years I tried Battlecruiser 3000 and BCM and Terminus and X: Beyond The Frontier and X2: The Threat. All sim-like. I still have a boyish giddiness for sims.
I seemed to move from simulations to strategy and back/forth, or to hybrids. I like 4x (Trade, Fight, Build, Think--or Explore, Exterminate, Exploit, Expand) and open world RPGs. Why? Hmm.
When I was younger I didn't read a lot of fiction. I did read some, but there were many kids who read more than me. Maybe hthat has something to do with it. I read more fiction when I was an adult. Prefered science-fiction.
I guess it'll just remain a mystery to me. I feel like I"m systems-oriented in my thinking. Does that mean anything? Maybe I'm partially autistic or something. I don't connect with people well. People are kind of boring. It's not htat I can't hold a conversation, I just tend to think about things, not people or emotions. Normal conversations turn boring too frequently. I think it's hard for me to make and keep friends because unless they like what I like I can't make a connection.