Edit: Lord Garithos should have been the leader of the alliance. Too bad he's dead.
No, it didn't. Warcraft 3 is a good game, that's that.i'm aware that the decline started here
No, it didn't. Warcraft 3 is a good game, that's that.i'm aware that the decline started here
WC 3 is far more interesting gameplay and lore wise compared to WC I and II combined.
That part actually took place in the unreleased Thrall adventure game, which is where that character you're running through the campaign comes from.Retconned the orcs into misunderstood savages along with other changes that I don't remember.
It is more interesting to have factions that have divergent morality than white humans living in castles vs. green humans living in huts.But it was a good retcon to be honest. How interesting is a setup in which GOOD GUYS IN ARMOUR beat BAD GUYS WITH GREEN SKIN WHO WORSHIP LITERAL DEMONS (that's W1 and W2 is you didn't get me meanin'). Come on guys.
True. It's not. And it was never true for the orcs while on Draenor. It's what Thrall believed to be true in the past, having been fed lies by Orgrim and building massive delusions due to his upbringing. And what Thrall tried to force on the Horde cost him severely.The "noble savage" trope is never good.
You know, it's not bad to have some ambitions when making your setting. Warhammer is just... simple. And it works.It works for warhammer.
Warhammer also has a dozen factions (if not more) which gives it a lot more leeway. Warcraft has 2. Always Chaotic Evil faction isn't too hammy when you have other factions that inhabit all the shades of grey - but it's boring when you only have the opposite. Popiel put it well.It works for warhammer.
Oh you absolutely can and should. And W3-era lore (W3 and some books) wins in almost every such encounter.I think that part of my problem comes from wow retarded lore. Can't separate these two.