Indeed.The only real bad thing that could be said about Human Revolution is the dumb plot about cyborg racism.
cuz the stuff in HR happens before DE1, so in a way HR is a cautionary warningIndeed.The only real bad thing that could be said about Human Revolution is the dumb plot about cyborg racism.
How did we go from sinister plots and utterly evil organizations and individuals hell bent on world domination through malevolent use of technology to the shit in Human Revolution?
I think the problem is that Human Revolution seems to be set far enough into the future of augmentations as to render that plot pointless.The only real bad thing that could be said about Human Revolution is the dumb plot about cyborg racism.
Omar ending?at least they respected that ending in IW where the world ends I guess
The one where the entire internet is shut down forcefully and the world goes back to a previous state technologically speaking iircOmar ending?at least they respected that ending in IW where the world ends I guess
Not just random thugs, there is enough augmented people for them to be treated as a marginalized "race" of people. One would think that requirements such as cutting your body part, getting hooked on neuropozin drug and the money cost of it would ensure that there are not many cyborgs running around but the end result is complete opposite.You got random thugs with augmented arms
Not common enough for them to be all over the place. They were a surprisingly rare sight in Deus Ex 1 and the few you do encounter are usually affilated with UNATCO/MJ12.Mechanical augmentations remained common even in Deus Ex.
Yep.Not just random thugs, there is enough augmented people for them to be treated as a marginalized "race" of people. One would think that requirements such as cutting your body part, getting hooked on neuropozin drug and the money cost of it would ensure that there are not many cyborgs running around but the end result is complete opposite.You got random thugs with augmented arms
Not common enough for them to be all over the place. They were a surprisingly rare sight in Deus Ex 1 and the few you do encounter are usually affilated with UNATCO/MJ12.Mechanical augmentations remained common even in Deus Ex.
Why are you trying to 100% a game you don't even like? It doesn't make sense. You're like that fucking otter with the watermelon.Tried Arkham City with a controller again. Still feels bad, all those items accessible from a radial menu with the one D-pad button. I mean, the whole game feels kinda bad anyway. I finished all of Robin in 2022, all of Batman in 2017 and all of Catwoman in 2015. Working on the Nightwing medals now, the last character, which will probably be over a span of years. I've shat on the retarded looking combat and its heavy automation most thoroughly, but the stealth really deserves a ton of criticism too for being so context-sensitive. Wonder if controller users accidentally press against walls/railings when they mean to hang like I do. They have to, right? Even just jumping down from the few designated high spots feels bad because the automated system only gives you a couple of spots on which to land.
I was 100% finishing save files years and years before my first PlayStation trophy. Actually, my obsession when I was a child was probably worse than that of many achievement hunters. I would play levels in Everything or Nothing and GoldenEye, for example, over and over and over and over again for the perfect run. Not for the score, but for the best LOOKING playthrough. I didn't always dislike Rocksteady's Batman games. (Disliked the gameplay and art at first, then got used to them because it's Batman and eventually disliked them again.) It's rare that I completely complete save files anymore and it would bother me to leave this one unfinished. Trying to meet all nine requirements with only three lives in a campaign or all three in a single map makes you better appreciate how clunky the gameplay can be, but it's a challenge. I don't even sign into "friends and chat" when I open Steam, so none of my "friends" look at my achievements anyway.Probably for achievement or trophies. You are better off not trying to understand how other people's autism works.
I was 100% finishing save files years and years before my first PlayStation trophy. Actually, my obsession when I was a child was probably worse than that of many achievement hunters. I would play levels in Everything or Nothing and GoldenEye, for example, over and over and over and over again for the perfect run. Not for the score, but for the best LOOKING playthrough. I didn't always dislike Rocksteady's Batman games. (Disliked the gameplay and art at first, then got used to them because it's Batman and eventually disliked them again.) It's rare that I completely complete save files anymore and it would bother me to leave this one unfinished. Trying to meet all nine requirements with only three lives in a campaign or all three in a single map makes you better appreciate how clunky the gameplay can be, but it's a challenge. I don't even sign into "friends and chat" when I open Steam, so none of my "friends" look at my achievements anyway.Probably for achievement or trophies. You are better off not trying to understand how other people's autism works.
That wasn't what I was saying. My point was that I'd be doing this even without the achievements. I was fulfilling the types of requirements that are now rewarded with achievements years before they were introduced to PlayStation. If I cared so much about achievements, I would get the last three in Crazy Taxi by getting less than a "CRAZY!!!" score. Yeah, I've considered games completed even when I didn't get really arbitrary, dumb achievements. Shadow of the Colossus was considered completed after I got all the items and climbed the shrine again, regardless of all the other trophies.Trophies/Achievement is not the same as doing 100% in a game for me. Some games you can do everything the game allows you, but you still didn't get all the achievement because you didn't kill "10 enemies with weapon X without getting hit once" for example. That has nothing to do with doing 100% in a game, just some stupid shit you need to do because devs had no idea what else they could ask players to do to unlock more achievements. It's also so arbitrary one could argue that, "yeah, you killed 10 enemies, but did you kill 15? 20? 100? Nah, then you didn't do everything in the game".