Putting the 'role' back in role-playing games since 2002.
Donate to Codex
Good Old Games
  • Welcome to rpgcodex.net, a site dedicated to discussing computer based role-playing games in a free and open fashion. We're less strict than other forums, but please refer to the rules.

    "This message is awaiting moderator approval": All new users must pass through our moderation queue before they will be able to post normally. Until your account has "passed" your posts will only be visible to yourself (and moderators) until they are approved. Give us a week to get around to approving / deleting / ignoring your mundane opinion on crap before hassling us about it. Once you have passed the moderation period (think of it as a test), you will be able to post normally, just like all the other retards.

Decline VR Sickness Rate is 40-70 percent after only 15 minutes

tritosine2k

Erudite
Joined
Dec 29, 2010
Messages
1,700
Many years ago there was a show in the UK known as Tomorrow's World. They interviewed a guy that was talking about his work on VR and he said it was dangerous because your eyes don't adjust according to how far away or close things are in the VR environment. So it kinda fucks with your brain.

I mentioned this already somewhere. But not sure I'd trust it. Even if they released "Virtual Sex with Sofia Vergara" I'm not sure it would be worth the brain damage.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fNzuzssl4eU


Much of the VR sickness scare was based on now-ancient studies using antique equipment never relevant to the 2010's VR renaissance.


And why "sensics" went out of business?

-& proof of above ?

It increasingly looks like there's a "rift" between the patents facebook is filling (huge foothold now) and the kind of early adopter gear the (increasingly bloody mouthed) followers get.
 

As an Amazon Associate, rpgcodex.net earns from qualifying purchases.
Back
Top Bottom