GueulEclator
Educated
- Joined
- Dec 4, 2012
- Messages
- 44
What a shitload of fallacies. This reminds me of Mein Kampf : A diarea of sentence with no coherence whatsoever and totally missing the point.
I think your example of dune showed you misunderstood me : no actual science fiction setting really follows their logic, because they would end up being what I described : a nice clusterfest of screwed realities. The author of the setting did said that the sience has got to a point where reality itself is screwed, so nano-robots shits dont follow the laws of physics, and even if they did, have you ever heard of the scientific prediction for just the near future? It's already fucked up just in 30 years, what should we expect in 1M year?
What I strongly condemn is the tendency of science fiction work of not following their own logic at all : when you foil the plan of a being that had access to mind altering/reality screwing technology, that is retarded.
You still keep saying I pull these stuff right out of my ass, fine. Prove it. Because they sound perfectly rational, and are the logical turn of technology. 1 Million year level Genome + robotic = trans-human technology, human becomes a backward biological being, everything is replaced by trans-human being that I don't have the pretension to understand (since they would be far above our current level).
And These illogical plot/setting end up being non authentic, not credible and feel completely cheap because everything is made of plot twist and direct author influence instead of a story that flows logically. Minimal conveniently limited devices, conveniently placed stuff, conveniently usable/unusable stuff, Minimal conveniently anything is required in believable/interesting plot.
I would have loved to keep it civil, but it seems that you felt the need to insult. I don't think you have trouble managing your anger. More like you just don't have the brain to engage in a discussion involving complex concepts that take time to muster and fully grasp. You then thought spamming insults would make it look like you're more right then me, because you use fancy derogatory terms. Acting all while not having anything to back this attitude (like absolute proofs...) . Typical forums tactic.
I think your example of dune showed you misunderstood me : no actual science fiction setting really follows their logic, because they would end up being what I described : a nice clusterfest of screwed realities. The author of the setting did said that the sience has got to a point where reality itself is screwed, so nano-robots shits dont follow the laws of physics, and even if they did, have you ever heard of the scientific prediction for just the near future? It's already fucked up just in 30 years, what should we expect in 1M year?
What I strongly condemn is the tendency of science fiction work of not following their own logic at all : when you foil the plan of a being that had access to mind altering/reality screwing technology, that is retarded.
You still keep saying I pull these stuff right out of my ass, fine. Prove it. Because they sound perfectly rational, and are the logical turn of technology. 1 Million year level Genome + robotic = trans-human technology, human becomes a backward biological being, everything is replaced by trans-human being that I don't have the pretension to understand (since they would be far above our current level).
And These illogical plot/setting end up being non authentic, not credible and feel completely cheap because everything is made of plot twist and direct author influence instead of a story that flows logically. Minimal conveniently limited devices, conveniently placed stuff, conveniently usable/unusable stuff, Minimal conveniently anything is required in believable/interesting plot.
I would have loved to keep it civil, but it seems that you felt the need to insult. I don't think you have trouble managing your anger. More like you just don't have the brain to engage in a discussion involving complex concepts that take time to muster and fully grasp. You then thought spamming insults would make it look like you're more right then me, because you use fancy derogatory terms. Acting all while not having anything to back this attitude (like absolute proofs...) . Typical forums tactic.