Putting the 'role' back in role-playing games since 2002.
Donate to Codex
Good Old Games
  • Welcome to rpgcodex.net, a site dedicated to discussing computer based role-playing games in a free and open fashion. We're less strict than other forums, but please refer to the rules.

    "This message is awaiting moderator approval": All new users must pass through our moderation queue before they will be able to post normally. Until your account has "passed" your posts will only be visible to yourself (and moderators) until they are approved. Give us a week to get around to approving / deleting / ignoring your mundane opinion on crap before hassling us about it. Once you have passed the moderation period (think of it as a test), you will be able to post normally, just like all the other retards.

Photo-realistic Graphics lead to decline in RPGs?

Bibbimbop

Bibbimbop

Arcane
Zionist Agent Vatnik
Joined
Jan 12, 2014
Messages
8,818
Location
Shadow Banned
Tyranicon said:
Photorealistic graphics in RPGs
Click to expand...

Meanwhile RPGs:

View attachment 51912

I can't think of a single modern RPG with graphics approaching anywhere near photorealistic, unless you're saying that word with a very broad definition.
Click to expand...

You can walk down the street in any major western city and see several people that look less realistically human than that.
 
Zed Duke of Banville

Zed Duke of Banville

Dungeon Master
Patron
Joined
Oct 3, 2015
Messages
13,138
MerchantKing said:
AAA "rpgs": 120 GB thanks to graphics and 150+ hours of shitty cutscenes. Graphics and Bioware were a mistake. Voice acting was also a mistake.
Click to expand...
Better graphics were fine; an emphasis on either photorealism or garish cartoonishness, in place of any aesthetic sensibility, is not.

xLlZK9N.gif


And, yes, Bioware was a mistake and decline from the start.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

As an Amazon Associate, rpgcodex.net earns from qualifying purchases.
Back
Top Bottom