Jesus Christ, are you trying to win some kind of prize for most wrong in a single post?
I am pretty sure I met more people with Down Syndrome in RL than gays. Why are people with Down Syndrome not represented in media?
Now that I read this I remembered that my Archer Fighter does not have Fighter Training bonuses with bows shown on character screen as well. Luckily it does add them to attack rolls when attacking.
this is another reason why i think 5e can be a good ruleset for a videogame.
or disable people in general.
On any given day, I meet and interact with more random people and hold more conversations than I do during any given sitting in which I play games. For the past couple of years at least, exactly zero people have felt the need to tell me about their gay lovers or their polyamorous relationship during the course of a conversation of any kind. The discrepancy ratio between reality and PF:K - and PF:K is a mild case in the current zeitgeist of gaming - is quite literally infinite.
I love this trope, though. Instant recognition. Oh, that dude has a peg-leg? He's got a hook for a hand? Pirate, obviously.
left: Me, staring at you all with disgust
right: poor Pathfinder thread, which has to live through your shitposting
And let's not discuss how ridiculous such things are in a world with Cure and Regeneration spells. Honestly, such things really should've had a limit to them, but given that PF (I believe, at least; it certainly applied to 3.5) doesn't even have rules for losing limbs and that Cure spells are capable of fixing pretty much everything and anything, I guess it'd be expecting too much.
I will let her play with my knifemaster's kukris if she let me touch her horns.I noticed there's a new concept art piece on Steam for the DLC. Maybe the new companion?
Yes but if your argument is "realism" then females should have a malus to Str and a lower cap (-4 perhaps) which means the outliers are stronger than an average man but not as strong as male outliers (which is accurate, look at female athletes).
Yeah they gave them actual characterization instead of making them Strong Wymyn paragons. Kind of like how Jaheira was also a strong wymyn but also a nagging shrew and a bitch which was acknowledged by other characters (until Beamdog got their hands on BG and totally changed her personality in Dragonspear
)
Even from the point of view of "variety" or "diversity" you'd think that making women actually different mechanically than men would add to said diversity - while making them exactly identical as men mechanically detracts from diversity in gameplay sense. But let's not demand too much from a person who believes that everyone who disagrees with him is "some insecure dudes" and uses this as an actual "argument" in his posts. That and alluding that they're also racists.Yes but if your argument is "realism" then females should have a malus to Str and a lower cap (-4 perhaps) which means the outliers are stronger than an average man but not as strong as male outliers (which is accurate, look at female athletes).
On the other hand, testosterone is a mild immunosuppressant so women could have higher Fort saves (or Con, like Arcanum did). You see where this is going, though, it's pointless and autistic to try and make everything so realistic, Paizo at least admit that their focus on representation is pretty much pandering instead of being realistic.
Yeah they gave them actual characterization instead of making them Strong Wymyn paragons. Kind of like how Jaheira was also a strong wymyn but also a nagging shrew and a bitch which was acknowledged by other characters (until Beamdog got their hands on BG and totally changed her personality in Dragonspear
