Anime Overwatch

[Revenant]

Also a white female is still inclusive. Even Reinhardt is because he's old. McCree is the only proper white male character in the game.

 

[Ocelot]

Brigitte is like a Reinhardt except with heals and armor. Hopefully she will be more unique than she looks.

Also a white female is still inclusive. Even Reinhardt is because he's old. McCree is the only proper white male character in the game.

Old characters are supposed to be good in terms of inclusiveness now? And if so, is Ana the ultimate hero of OW?

 

[TheHeroOfTime]

No exceptions

 

[Talby]

Also a white female is still inclusive. Even Reinhardt is because he's old. McCree is the only proper white male character in the game.

Soldier 76, Junkrat, Torbjorn and possibly Roadhog (hard to tell from the mask, but he is Australian) are all fucking white males. A full SJW OverWatch would have half or more of the European characters be blacks/browns.

Go watch the Reinhardt animated trailer. It's basically Triumph of the Will: Pixar Edition.

 

[Zer0wing]

inclusive.

Hey, inclusive boi. Lawbreakers is two blocks down. This is Overwatch thread.

 

[Astral Rag]

Ban all overwatch players.

 

[Gerrard]

inclusive.

Hey, inclusive boi. Lawbreakers is two blocks down. This is Overwatch thread.

E: FUCK

 

[Revenant]

The point is that all the above mentioned characters are handicapped in some way - Soldier likely has a disfigured face beneath his mask, Junkrat is a cripple, Torbjorn - a dwarf, Roadhog - fat. Only McCree is a white male without any disability, even so he has a bionic arm which could put him into the "oppressed" category in some scenarios.

 

[Quatlo]

Now thats just moving the goalpost

 

[Revenant]

Handicapped/old/wrong gender are inclusive as much as people of color. What's so hard to understand here?

 

[Black]

Junkrat

Obvious spic. Lights tires on fire and shit.

 

[SkiNNyBane]

The biggest lesson this generation of games will have to learn the hard way is adding more shit to the game after a certain point only makes it worse and impossible to balance.

 

[Ocelot]

The biggest lesson this generation of games will have to learn the hard way is adding more shit to the game after a certain point only makes it worse and impossible to balance.

Yes but how will poor companies make money if they don't create more cool and edgy characters to sell more cosmetic skins? League of Legends did it by releasing dozens of unneeded, anime-inspired champions and people not only but their stuff but they even spend money for the actual heroes.

 

[SkiNNyBane]

The biggest lesson this generation of games will have to learn the hard way is adding more shit to the game after a certain point only makes it worse and impossible to balance.

Yes but how will poor companies make money if they don't create more cool and edgy characters to sell more cosmetic skins? League of Legends did it by releasing dozens of unneeded, anime-inspired champions and people not only but their stuff but they even spend money for the actual heroes.

I agree but this bring up an important point I forgot to mention. MOBAs are uniquely equipped to deal with multitude of heroes by nature of their design. 1. Draft. 2. Items. 3. General type of game it is. Games try to copy mobas but forget that you have to design games from ground up with features that make it possible to have that much crap.

Overwatch for example is clearly failing because they didn't bother to ask themselves if their vision was realistic. At first they thought they could get away with having multiple of each hero and within a month of release realized it was wishful thinking and made single hero limit. However they are still stubborn to admit that having ult based on dmg/healing instead of static timer is inherently a really bad idea especially when you want to keep adding heroes. They are already removing healing building sombra ult paving a way hopefully to later realizing the whole idea is crap. Then they don't allow items or skill trees and instead of draft have people picking heroes at any time. Combined they made a bunch of hipster design decisions that are cringe level of building themselves into a balancing nightmare.

 

[Zer0wing]

Combined they made a bunch of hipster design decisions that are cringe level of building themselves into a balancing nightmare.

Or they do it on purpose, keep tinkering with balance for the rest of game's (not necessarily only Overwatch, any of their games) lifecycle to keep interest going. Apparently a well balanced game will become stale and eventually be forgotten, or so Blizztard thinks.

 

[Gerrard]

As if they ever made anything balanced besides Starcraft. And we all know how that ended.
The dumbest decision in Overwatch's design was making it 6v6 and working around that, and not bigger. And retards like TheHeroOfTime will argue this while crying that only 1/3rd of the characters see any play.

 

[SkiNNyBane]

As if they ever made anything balanced besides Starcraft. And we all know how that ended.
The dumbest decision in Overwatch's design was making it 6v6 and working around that, and not bigger. And retards like TheHeroOfTime will argue this while crying that only 1/3rd of the characters see any play.

Wait what? Bigger? 6v6 for this type of game is already highly pushing it. I hope you meant 5v5 (smaller) and mispoke.

 

[Gangrelrumbler]

I hope he meant 20 vs 20 TF2-like total chaos on huuuuuge maps.

 

[Gerrard]

As if they ever made anything balanced besides Starcraft. And we all know how that ended.
The dumbest decision in Overwatch's design was making it 6v6 and working around that, and not bigger. And retards like TheHeroOfTime will argue this while crying that only 1/3rd of the characters see any play.

Wait what? Bigger? 6v6 for this type of game is already highly pushing it. I hope you meant 5v5 (smaller) and mispoke.

Found the guy who plays 3v3.

 

[SkiNNyBane]

I hope he meant 20 vs 20 TF2-like total chaos on huuuuuge maps.

I mean sure thats fun to dick around casually but as serious mode 5v5 is a pretty good number where its not overly spammy and you focusing targets doesnt instantly blow them up.

 

[Gangrelrumbler]

I hope he meant 20 vs 20 TF2-like total chaos on huuuuuge maps.

I mean sure thats fun to dick around casually but as serious mode 5v5 is a pretty good number where its not overly spammy and you focusing targets doesnt instantly blow them up.

I don't think these kind of games should be taken seriously.

 

[unfairlight]

Imagine taking the most casual shooter there is on the market seriously.

 

[Muty]

competitive overwatch is an oxymoron.

 

[Ocelot]

As if they ever made anything balanced besides Starcraft. And we all know how that ended.
The dumbest decision in Overwatch's design was making it 6v6 and working around that, and not bigger. And retards like TheHeroOfTime will argue this while crying that only 1/3rd of the characters see any play.

So how big would you want OW to be? 10v10? More?

 

[Gerrard]

As if they ever made anything balanced besides Starcraft. And we all know how that ended.
The dumbest decision in Overwatch's design was making it 6v6 and working around that, and not bigger. And retards like TheHeroOfTime will argue this while crying that only 1/3rd of the characters see any play.

So how big would you want OW to be? 10v10? More?

8v8 probably, maybe 9. Of course everything then would have to be designed around that number.


>but the game is already impossible to watch even with 6v6
Who gives a fuck? Do you watch OW games? Are you some kind of a faggot?
>muh esports
Fuck off.