Brotherman Bill
Arcane
- Joined
- Dec 31, 2009
- Messages
- 6,933
I doubt it. The RTS genre really isn't very profitable.
You're joking. You may not like it, but Warcraft III created like 95% of the current Warcraft lore. If anything, it was Blizzard's greatest creative burst. For the past decade WoW has been nothing but "let's milk out everything we did on WIII".Warcraft III was already a fuck up, at least lore and story wise.
You're joking. You may not like it, but Warcraft III created like 95% of the current Warcraft lore. If anything, it was Blizzard's greatest creative burst. For the past decade WoW has been nothing but "let's milk out everything we did on WIII".Warcraft III was already a fuck up, at least lore and story wise.
Now they sucked it so dry they had to go back to WII, but...
You may not like it, but Warcraft III created like 95% of the current Warcraft lore
Blizzard's Overwatch hits trademark problem
When Blizzard announced Overwatch at BlizzCon last year, the news was met with much excitement.
Overwatch is a team-based multiplayer first-person shooter from the makers of World of Warcraft. It's the developer's first new property in years.
But the project has run into an unexpected problem with the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). According to documents posted on NeoGAF today, the USPTO has suspended Blizzard's application for a trademark for Overwatch, due to "a likelihood of confusion" with a previously registered trademark.
That trademark is also being sought by Innovis Labs, which uses it for an app that offers "a tactical utility to enhance airsoft, paintball and first-person shooter gameplay events." Both applications are therefore within the broad realm of gaming.
Innovis' blurb states that its Overwatch is "inspired by classic first-person shooter video games." Its application has also been suspended. Blizzard's trademark is currently listed as active, but this may be due to the suspension notice only recently being posted. It's likely that both companies are seeking more evidence to support their own claims.
Polygon has contacted Blizzard and Innovis for comment. We'll update as soon we we hear back from either company.
Blizzard DOTA?Broad realm of gaming indeed :D I don't see Blizzard losing the name either way.
Blizzard announced two new characters, the first of which is McCree, who wears a belt that says "BAMF." He's the "ultimate futuristic gunslinger,"
McCree wields a peacekeep revolver that is deadly at short range and is also capable of sniping enemies from afar. His super-ability, meanwhile, is called "Deadeye." This allows McCree to target multiple enemies simultaneously, killing them all--when locked on--with a single shot.
The other new Overwatch character announced today was Zarya, the game's first female tank character. According to Blizzard, Zarya originally wanted to be a weightlifting champion, but she later enlisted in battle to fight for the freedom of her world.
That ¡s an understatement and you know it. Let's be fair, the game is well designed for shitplaying, stable and well publitized. Just not good enough to foster real competition.Who else could ask a couple of interns to make a by the numbers card trading game with unity in a couple of months and not only get away with it but also make millions with it?