A: Bullshitting these kids seems like a bad idea. Trying to paint ourselves as some sort of good guy sounds like it could backfire on us spectacularly down the road when it's obvious that we're not. Appearing as a great hero to your minions, only to have them become disillusioned later, has been the downfall of many an evil Overlord. This way, even though we're an asshole, we'd be an honest asshole.
And honestly, do you really see Erdrick as being good enough at manipulation to convince these kids that he's some sort of saint for the next couple of years? Fuck, sounds like too much work. He'd rather avoid it altogether.
A: The clear and obvious choice here. Our character is a pervert at heart and he has not gotten laid in quite some time. We need to unwind and relax a bit. The last few weeks have been nothing but battle and adventure.
B: While I think payment in breasts would be sufficient, we did loot the bodies for a reason.
Alright, flop to AAC. I'm generally in agreement and this is similar to my original vote anyway... but I still think they gave us the money, it's only half the normal payment, it seems way too needlessly dogoody to give it back. Kreia would be furious. If we can't take all the loot back, the villagers can loot the rest, or not. No need to do it and trade.
Then we must kill ourselves.But what if the true Theseus... is us?
The way I see it, if we can't carry all the loot, why not let the villagers have it? That is, assuming that they aren't creeped out by the prospect of accepting spoils of war from the dead. Would they be, treave?
Didn't we pull a Theseus earlier? You know, betraying all of our friends (many of which seemed a good deal closer to us than Kyle) and so on for the sake of attraction to a pretty girl?
From Barzamites? They kinda tried to slaughter them all for laughs and politics, I don't know how their reprisals would be any different from their normal behavior.Taking the loot from the dead may bring reprisals.
I am not seeing the problem. The village owes us 20 silver coins - going by the rates of the Adventurers' Guild, which they assumed we belong to - but can only afford 10. The girl is a way to compensate for those missing profits.Y'know, I think that we'll net a sufficient score from the loot in the battle. Asking for tits and money might make the villagers resentful. They'll do it if we demand it, but I think it'll stir up some ill will with them
You mean, the Protagonist. The Hero. That is, Kyle. Whom we plan to kill even now because of our love for Mieren.We weren't actually going to kill them. Besides, as I said, Theseus tries to kill the Player Character.
You mean the Shulgi hunts where we try to kill people over a possibility of them trying to fuck us or our crew over?Granted, most people would prioritize a loved one over anyone else, but the Theseus doesn't even need a direct threat to that person's life in order to kill the player character.
"Give a man a fish and you feed him for a day; teach a man to fish and you feed him for a lifetime."Giving them a bunch of loot pilfered from the dead seems like it would be off-putting.
And if we don't like her, we can still sell her off to return the investment. Good choice all around!And, well, assuming that this girl is worth ten silvers, then I suppose it's a fair trade, isn't it?
"Give a man a fish and you feed him for a day; teach a man to fish and you feed him for a lifetime."
Terry Pratchett said:“Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set fire to him and he's warm for the rest of his life.”
Well, the only reason they attacked this village was to lure the prince. They attacked the village with a small force and kept the rest of their troops waiting in the forest to surprise the prince. The goal was never to wipe out the village itself - only to draw the prince in to their trap. The next time, they would just want to bring all the troops quickly, slaughter the village and call it a day. That'll teach those greedy buggers.From Barzamites? They kinda tried to slaughter them all for laughs and politics, I don't know how their reprisals would be any different from their normal behavior.
No, again, Theseus is a term reserved for things that relate to the player character and not to NPCs. This is mainly because it seems particular to treave's own writing style to have characters that are motivated by love to be perfectly fine with murdering the player for any number of reasons - not that I'm criticizing that or saying it's unreasonable, just that it's a recurring theme. It has nothing to do with a moral judgment against Kyle or ourselves. It's merely a meta-classification for non-player characters. We are not an NPC and treave isn't solely responsible for our decisions. Therefor, no matter what we do, we cannot be a "Theseus". We can act like one, but we can never be one.You mean, the Protagonist. The Hero. That is, Kyle. Whom we plan to kill even now because of our love for Mieren.
Shulgi is an entirely different classification. Shulgi is a perceived menace that we do not know actually poses a threat, but merely suspect that it does. For example, at present, Kyle could be our Shulgi, if we were obsessing over what-ifs about him knowing we've resurrected and gunning for us.You mean the Shulgi hunts where we try to kill people over a possibility of them trying to fuck us or our crew over?
This is mainly because it seems particular to treave's own writing style to have characters that are motivated by love to be perfectly fine with murdering the player for any number of reasons - not that I'm criticizing that or saying it's unreasonable, just that it's a recurring theme.
The real threat isn't the adventurers guild but the level one villianess and her Theseus in training brother that we are currently raising. I foresee the two of them becoming a problem if we don't raise them carefully.
Yep. And not just from me. But it's less about butthurt now and more about eliminating a threat. Keep in mind that every character I have accused of being a Theseus has been a Theseus. All of them.That Theseus guy sure generated a lot of butthurt
Oh. 'This player character acts to NPCs like a Theseus would to PCs, but since I have arbitrarily excluded exactly that outcome from the word's definition he totally can't be called that.' Okay then.No, again, Theseus is a term reserved for things that relate to the player character and not to NPCs.
If it looks like a duck, swims like a duck, and quacks like a duck, then it probably is a duck.We can act like one, but we can never be one.
You mean like Jing murdered that poor bastard of an Imperial agent FOR SHUN, right? I mean, there was no particular reason, but it might have harmed our beloved somehow and so we killed him just to be on the safeThis is mainly because it seems particular to treave's own writing style to have characters that are motivated by love to be perfectly fine with murdering the player for any number of reasons
Oh, I'd love to.Don't conflate the meta-memes.
Theseus-Shulgi
I wonder.Yep. And not just from me.