- Joined
- Jun 18, 2002
- Messages
- 28,547
Actually all you've been doing is speculating on how you've never encountered any such problems (even mentioning your 1 - 2 seconds loading times before any of the patches), therefore the game is fine. Unfortunately, even if you care to read the official Witcher forums, you will notice both load times (even with 1.3) and desktop crashes still occur. These issues make the game unplayable for the people who experience them. CD Projekt recognise that. It's why they're including a bunch of "stability fixes" in the Enhanced Edition and why loading times are a big focus. Just because you say it's a non-issue doesn't mean it's true. Otherwise, they'd be out there saying "download patch 1.2 right now!" wouldn't they? Or are they really just performing a marketing driven hype-exercise, like I referred to in the opening news post?Jeff Graw said:I already replied to this, but you conveniently forgot to quote my responseDarkUnderlord said:So why are loading times reduced by 80% in the Enhanced Edition and why is it a "core feature"?
In which case this entire Enhanced Edition (of which loading times is a big focus in every interview) is just a pure marketing exercise designed to gain more money by selling the GOTY Edition.Jeff Graw said:TW took a lot of flak for it's loading times when it first came out, so it comes as no surprise that they would advertise improved loading times in the EE even if it's already been fixed. If they increased the loading times again, then that's even better, but as it stands now the loading times are already quick with the current updates.
So you admit the game causes crashes then and has stability issues for some users? That just because you don't have any problems, other people don't either?Jeff Graw said:As I said before, all games have bugs, no matter how polished, and there will always be new bugs to squash.DarkUnderlord said:that wonderful link that Mareus gave, that the Enhanced Edition "first and foremost" fixes bugs (including new bugs). Secondly, it addresses issues which "really hindered gameplay". So which is it? Is the game "really hindered" by all these issues or isn't it?
Actually the first thing he says when talking about "hindered gameplay" is "faster loading times". If you'd actually bothered to watch the video, you'd have noticed that. So either they're conducting a giant hype exercise to sell more copies of their game by talking about fixing a problem which has already been fixed (and which the game was widely derided for) or :shock horror: loading times are still an issue. Given you claim to have never had issues with loading times even with the unpatched version of the game, why do you consider it an issue that's been fixed? How would you even know?Jeff Graw said:As for issues that hindered gameplay, they're probably talking about the new alchemy and inventory screens (the previous alchemy screen was pretty unintuitive) and the new combat system.
I don't view new voices which you can't even really tell the difference between (Before / After) as a huge update. But hey, maybe that's just me. If these changes really are so significant though then again, it means the original game can't have been that good, unless of course this is just a hype-driven marketing exercise.Jeff Graw said:And everything that was offered for free pales in comparison to what CDPR is offering in the EE update.DarkUnderlord said:Everything in the Morrowind GOTY that wasn't an expansion pack was available for download for free (IE: The patches and game editor).
That's not the comparison I was making, so I guess that says a lot about your own intelligence and lack there-of. We're talking about companies milking the hype train for their GOTY release. UT2004 milked that train with the cash back offer. CD Projekt are milking it with a brand new release and "fixed loading times" (which are already fixed, right?).Jeff Graw said:And that doesen't change the fact that you're comparing apples and oranges. Releasing a free mega-update and putting new versions of the game on store shelves isn't the same as taking a full priced failure of a game, adding a couple new game modes and a shitload of maps, and rereleasing as a completely new game for full price without any kind of upgrade path from the original game. It's not even close. One is rewarding the consumer, the other is shafting him. That you would even think such a comparison is valid says a lot about your intelligence.DarkUnderlord said:mondblut was talking about companies milking their games with the GOTY release, dummy (just like The Witcher is doing).
So people who bought the game when it came out are screwed because they missed out on all the awesome stuff and have to buy the game again if they want it? Nah, that's not a marketing exercise. No way.Mareus said:Don't forget all the additional content like map, music CD, etc. if you actually buy the TWEE for which the price is also symbolic.