Squid
Arbiter
- Joined
- May 31, 2018
- Messages
- 536
Is that original content there?
Is that original content there?
Whhh ... what?Yet you forgot the main thing what makes game a game, gameplay, where even new vegas don't have it compared to old fallouts.
Ofcourse, because gameplay will be tons better
Neither does Fallout 76, which is a game you seem to be sucking dick from. So, you criticize New Vegas for being a shooter and being in Gamebryo and yet you are praising Fallout 76 for basically the same thing. Nice contradiction there and another proof you certainly deserve those tags.Yet you forgot the main thing what makes game a game, gameplay, where even new vegas don't have it compared to old fallouts.
So is chess according to you retarded? because it has no writing/story/characters, only 'greatest' gameplay.Even if something had the "greatest" gameplay, with retarded writing/story/characters I would not play it.
so go read a book or watch a movieBut I am a story-/tone-/writing-fag eh.
Pah you probably love Han Solo and the new Episodes VII and VIII.
Neither does Fallout 76, which is a game you seem to be sucking dick from. So, you criticize New Vegas for being a shooter and being in Gamebryo and yet you are praising Fallout 76 for basically the same thing. Nice contradiction there and another proof you certainly deserve those tags.Yet you forgot the main thing what makes game a game, gameplay, where even new vegas don't have it compared to old fallouts.
Neither does Fallout 76, which is a game you seem to be sucking dick from. So, you criticize New Vegas for being a shooter and being in Gamebryo and yet you are praising Fallout 76 for basically the same thing. Nice contradiction there and another proof you certainly deserve those tags.Yet you forgot the main thing what makes game a game, gameplay, where even new vegas don't have it compared to old fallouts.
F76 will have different tone to its gameplay than 3/nv, its like comparing call of duty and red orchestra.
Chess is a fucking board game you idiot.So is chess according to you retarded? because it has no writing/story/characters, only 'greatest' gameplay.
Yeah. I agree with most of what you're saying here actually. I've never been opposed to new things in Fallout, only new things that don't do the name justice. We don't need familiar enemies to be Fallout. Style and the overarching themes are the most important thing about any series (nearly) in my opinion.are much more open to new ideas that do not always rely on "being yet more of the same"
I think it is actually the fandom, at least those among Bethesda itself and the new fans of the Fallout franchise that are holding back the franchise's universe to be developed further in a meaningful way.
What the fuck are you even talking about? You criticized New Vegas for being a shooter and in Gamebryo and Fallout 76 is a shooter and in Gamebryo. What the fuck does tone have to do with anything? Fallout 76 is a shooter, which is not what the original two games were. So don't be an hypocrite by criticizing a game for doing a thing and then praise another for doing the same. You criticized New Vegas just being a shooter, not if it was a good or bad shooter.Neither does Fallout 76, which is a game you seem to be sucking dick from. So, you criticize New Vegas for being a shooter and being in Gamebryo and yet you are praising Fallout 76 for basically the same thing. Nice contradiction there and another proof you certainly deserve those tags.Yet you forgot the main thing what makes game a game, gameplay, where even new vegas don't have it compared to old fallouts.
F76 will have different tone to its gameplay than 3/nv, its like comparing call of duty and red orchestra.
So a good story, characters and writing? Oh wait, no it won't because New Vegas already did it and Fallout 76 is written by Emil Whatever and he can't write for shit.So hyped, Fallout 76 is bringing back plenty of things from Fallout 1 which was not in 3/nv/4, while doing new stuff that sounds good.
Fallout 76's multiplayer "is not what everybody expects"
Pete Hines says some have the wrong idea about multiplayer in their game.
Back at E3 we got a whole load of details about Bethesda's Fallout 76, and during the event in Los Angeles we also caught up with company frontman Pete Hines to have a chat, during which time we asked him about their approach to multiplayer considering they've advertised themselves as saviours of the single-player.
"Well, first of all, as a publisher I am extremely comfortable with where we are in single-player games, between all of the stuff that we did last year and all of the things we just announced, right," Hines explained. "We didn't just announce Prey last year as a wholly single-player game, but then we just released brand new DLC for it and a ton of free updates for the game. Wolfenstein is a single-player game that we wanted to add co-op to because we figured with the twin sisters, rather than her just being AI, that would be cool [...] Rage 2, Doom Eternal - all of these games are embracing and doing single-player, as is Fallout 76."
"When I play, I'm not on the schedule of a lot of people that I work with or my friends or my kids, so I end up playing any kind of game that's online by myself anyway. I've played Fallout 76 almost entirely that way myself because that's kind of my preference, and I sort of want to see what that feels like."
"But the truth is this game is not what everybody expects or immediately jumps to. I understand when you hear 'online' or you hear 'multiplayer' or 'PvP' that people jump to 'well, it's an MMO' or 'it's a free-for-all where everybody's just shooting each other' or 'I'm gonna get griefed constantly by other players'. And the fact is, this just doesn't fit into the mould of anything else, because that's what Bethesda Game Studios does."
"We aren't the type of company and they're not the type of developer that looks at what somebody else is doing and says 'oh, we're just gonna do that'. No, we're gonna do something we feel is very unique in the space that somebody else hasn't really done, because that's what we're actually best at, is doing things and going places where other folks aren't trying and pushing boundaries a little bit, so I think as more information comes out and folks understand it's not tons and tons of people, it's post-apocalyptic, it's gonna be dozens and dozens, not hundreds, that you can't just have someone keep chasing you down and killing you over and over again, the game just doesn't allow for that - the PvP is almost more of a challenge system, not just a 'kill everybody that you see' - that we do want folks to roleplay."