Fallout 76 - online Fallout spinoff from Bethesda - now on Steam with Wastelanders NPC expansion

[PorkBarrellGuy]

super mutants

A Fallout game doesn't need Super Mutants to be a Fallout game, this is a stupid mentality a lot of the Fallout 3 and 4 fans seem to have.

Know what they should have for enemies in the West Virginia Wasteland? Giant radioactive mutant wild hogs.

 

[Makabb]

super mutants

A Fallout game doesn't need Super Mutants to be a Fallout game, this is a stupid mentality a lot of the Fallout 3 and 4 fans seem to have.

You need them, Fallout 1 without super mutants would cut half of the game and main quest

 

[Okagron]

You need them, Fallout 1 without super mutants would cut half of the game and main quest

That's Fallout 1, i meant not EVERY Fallout game needs Super Mutants to be a Fallout game. Shoehorning them into a Fallout game, even when it makes no sense like in Fallout 3, just reeks of lazyness.

 

[PorkBarrellGuy]

You need them, Fallout 1 without super mutants would cut half of the game and main quest

That's Fallout 1, i meant not EVERY Fallout game needs Super Mutants to be a Fallout game. Shoehorning them into a Fallout game, even when it makes no sense like in Fallout 3, just reeks of lazyness.

Not just laziness. Cheap cash-in mentality. Like Bethesda was thinking "Put some giant green men in FO3, bitches love giant green men" rather than go "well, what would make sense/be cool"

 

[PanteraNera]

A Fallout game doesn't need Super Mutants to be a Fallout game, this is a stupid mentality a lot of the Fallout 3 and 4 fans seem to have.

They need something they can relate to ... on an intellectual level.

 

[Makabb]

You need them, Fallout 1 without super mutants would cut half of the game and main quest

That's Fallout 1, i meant not EVERY Fallout game needs Super Mutants to be a Fallout game. Shoehorning them into a Fallout game, even when it makes no sense like in Fallout 3, just reeks of lazyness.

Fallout lore wise at this point is a retconn and fan service, so having super mutants and not something out of place is the best we can have.

 

[PorkBarrellGuy]

You need them, Fallout 1 without super mutants would cut half of the game and main quest

That's Fallout 1, i meant not EVERY Fallout game needs Super Mutants to be a Fallout game. Shoehorning them into a Fallout game, even when it makes no sense like in Fallout 3, just reeks of lazyness.

Fallout lore wise at this point is a retconn and fan service, so having super mutants and not something out of place is the best we can have.

"Beth ruined it and turned it into shit so you might as well start eating shit"

How about no

 

[Makabb]

You need them, Fallout 1 without super mutants would cut half of the game and main quest

That's Fallout 1, i meant not EVERY Fallout game needs Super Mutants to be a Fallout game. Shoehorning them into a Fallout game, even when it makes no sense like in Fallout 3, just reeks of lazyness.

Fallout lore wise at this point is a retconn and fan service, so having super mutants and not something out of place is the best we can have.

"Beth ruined it and turned it into shit so you might as well start eating shit"

How about no

there were super mutants in fallout 2 also

 

[Okagron]

Fallout lore wise at this point is a retconn and fan service, so having super mutants and not something out of place is the best we can have.

This is why this franchise died with 3, got brought back with New Vegas, and then got murdered again with 4. Welp, i always have Fallout 1, 2 and New Vegas for my Fallout fix.

there were super mutants in fallout 2 also

So? And they also had a point of being in there, to show not every Super Mutant is a murdering asshole. They were also in New Vegas, to continue the journey of Marcus. They had no point of being in 3 and 4 except Bethesda needed a "big" enemy for the player to fight.

 

[PorkBarrellGuy]

You need them, Fallout 1 without super mutants would cut half of the game and main quest

That's Fallout 1, i meant not EVERY Fallout game needs Super Mutants to be a Fallout game. Shoehorning them into a Fallout game, even when it makes no sense like in Fallout 3, just reeks of lazyness.

Fallout lore wise at this point is a retconn and fan service, so having super mutants and not something out of place is the best we can have.

"Beth ruined it and turned it into shit so you might as well start eating shit"

How about no

there were super mutants in fallout 2 also

A look inside the mind of a Bethestard: "I know what Fallout fans really love about the Fallout series. Giant green men and Ron Perlman's voice. That's what makes the Fallout series great."

Fuck sake.

 

[Makabb]

This is why this franchise died with 3, got brought back with New Vegas, and then got murdered again with 4. Welp, i always have Fallout 1, 2 and New Vegas for my Fallout fix.

New Vegas did not brought back anything, it was more of the same vomit like Bethesda, with derp derp writing with the Roman Legion which is totaly out of place

there were super mutants in fallout 2 also
So? And they also had a point of being in there, to show not every Super Mutant is a murdering asshole.

So they can be in other fallouts also

 

[Makabb]

You need them, Fallout 1 without super mutants would cut half of the game and main quest

That's Fallout 1, i meant not EVERY Fallout game needs Super Mutants to be a Fallout game. Shoehorning them into a Fallout game, even when it makes no sense like in Fallout 3, just reeks of lazyness.

Fallout lore wise at this point is a retconn and fan service, so having super mutants and not something out of place is the best we can have.

"Beth ruined it and turned it into shit so you might as well start eating shit"

How about no

there were super mutants in fallout 2 also

A look inside the mind of a Bethestard: "I know what Fallout fans really love about the Fallout series. Giant green men and Ron Perlman's voice. That's what makes the Fallout series great."

Fuck sake.

We are talking about lore currently only if you did not notice.

 

[Okagron]

New Vegas did not brought back anything, it was more of the same vomit like Bethesda, with derp derp writing with the Roman Legion which is totaly out of place

Welp, the shitposter and Bethestard tags check out. Just the mere fact you think New Vegas did "not brought back anything" and Caesar's Legion is out of place, just shows you don't have a fucking clue what this franchise is actually about. New Vegas is closest the franchise got to a proper Fallout game since 2, 3 and 4 are putrid crap that deserve to burn in the deepest pits of hell.

So they can be in other fallouts also

If they have a point, which they didn't in 3 and 4. Because Bethesda doesn't know what the purpose of Super Mutants actually is.

 

[Makabb]

New Vegas did not brought back anything, it was more of the same vomit like Bethesda, with derp derp writing with the Roman Legion which is totaly out of place

Welp, the shitposter and Bethestard tags checks out. Just the mere fact you think New Vegas did " not brought back anything" and Caesar's Legion is out of place, just shows you don't have a fucking clue what this franchise is actually about. New Vegas is closest the franchise got to a proper Fallout game since 2, 3 and 4 are putrid crap that deserve to burn in the deepest pits of hell.

I will go play fallout 1 and 2 and you go play new vegas because it seems it is the game for you.

 

[PanteraNera]

Fallout 1 is the best Fallout there is re-read what Okagron said.
Duh!

 

[Makabb]

Fallout 1 is the best Fallout there is re-read what Okagron said.
Duh!

that's why comparing even new vegas to fallout 1, 2 is a heresy !

 

[PorkBarrellGuy]

Fallout 1 is the best Fallout there is re-read what Okagron said.
Duh!

that's why comparing even new vegas to fallout 1, 2 is a heresy !

except FNV is a decent game as opposed to 3 and 4 and most likely 76

 

[PanteraNera]

Fallout 1 is the best Fallout there is re-read what Okagron said.
Duh!

that's why comparing even new vegas to fallout 1, 2 is a heresy !

Fallout New Vegas is more faithful to Fallout 1 and 2 than Fallout 3 and 4 are.
There is no heresy in that.

my personal ranking:
1. Fallout 1
2. Fallout 2 / Fallout New Vegas
3. Fallout Tactics
4. Fallout 3
5. Fallout 4

 

[Makabb]

Fallout 1 is the best Fallout there is re-read what Okagron said.
Duh!

that's why comparing even new vegas to fallout 1, 2 is a heresy !

except FNV is a decent game as opposed to 3 and 4 and most likely 76

76 will be the vault 13 project that Interplay wanted to do, it will have different gameplay feel to 3/4/nv and it will be better than them

 

[Makabb]

Fallout 1 is the best Fallout there is re-read what Okagron said.
Duh!

that's why comparing even new vegas to fallout 1, 2 is a heresy !

Fallout New Vegas is more faithful to Fallout 1 and 2 than Fallout 3 and 4 are.
There is no heresy in that.

my personal ranking:
1. Fallout 1
2. Fallout 2 / Fallout New Vegas
3. Fallout Tactics
4. Fallout 3
5. Fallout 4

heresy putting new vegas = fallout 2 !

new vegas is running on the bethesda gamebryo engine and is a shooter, who is the bethestard here.

 

[PanteraNera]

heresy putting new vegas = fallout 2 !

new vegas is running on the bethesda gamebryo engine and is a shooter, who is the bethestard here.

You, as you think Fallout 76 will be better than F:NV
Honestly, it seems like you have no idea what people liked about Fallout (we are talking here about personal tastes).
Certainly when it comes to why some loved Fallout 1 and hated Fallout 2.
Writing, lore and tone.

 

[Makabb]

Writing, lore and tone.

Yet you forgot the main thing what makes game a game, gameplay, where even new vegas don't have it compared to old fallouts.

 

[Makabb]

You, as you think Fallout 76 will be better than F:NV
.

Ofcourse, because gameplay will be tons better, I don't care about lore and writing since fallout 2, because since then 'real' fallout is dead.

 

[Squid]

Jesus, Makabb do you ever slow down?

 

[Makabb]

Jesus, Makabb do you ever slow down?