JamesDixon
GM Extraordinaire
I think it's a bit more complex than that.
It's not. The axis are Good =/= selfless, Evil =/= selfishness, Law =/= organization, and Chaos =/= independence. How the two axis interacts determines the extent of said evil or good.
Evil in DnD is also related to sociopathy, casual acts of cruelty and so on.
Evil is just selfishness. What you are looking for is the intersection between evil and the other axis that goes from Lawful to Chaos. Chaotic Evil is pure psychopathy while Lawful Evil is using the government to realize your selfish goals. Removing a person's life in either case would have hanging being a fit punishment, but not for stealing/not sharing food to survive.
Would it be considered an evil act to use magic to turn someone's Alignment to Good?
Depends on if the character performing the spell is Lawful, Neutral, or Chaotic. Under a Lawful axis it's a good thing as you are pursuing the greater good of the entirety of the people. If you're neutral it's not evil in the slightest. You have no opinion on the matter. If you're Chaotic then yes, it's an evil act as you are removing a person's will/independence from the equation.
AD&D 2E has the best explanation on the alignments and makes it all clear. The following are from the PHB and DMG respectively.
DMG pages 38-39
I hope that clears up my position. I'll ask my question again, "If a person that doesn't share his food (evil =/= selfish) does that warrant him being put to death by a paladin or even a Lawful cleric?"
My answer using the alignment explanation from AD&D 2E would be no. Not sharing your food isn't a criminal offense as it is your property. If there is a famine going on and the society needs that food the only Lawful Neutral/Lawful Good option available to the paladin/cleric is to purchase the food from the individual. A Lawful Evil cleric would use the law/government as the method to seize the food from the individual.
Last edited: