What class are you going to pick in the upcoming Pathfinder: Kingmaker?

[Zero Credibility]

Then what the hell was all that talk about the half-orc crunch? You trying to bluff you have any idea what you are talking about Pathfinder and failing miserably?

 

[Cael]

Half-Orcs are amazing in Pathfinder. This isn't D&D. They gave them a flexible attribute bonus so you can use them for anything.

Sacred Tattoo + Fate's Favoured is a +2 bonus to ALL saves. That is feat equivalent power to taking three feats. Far stronger than any single bonus feat a human can take.

If you blew three feats to get +2 bonus to all saves, you are a retard.

 

[Cael]

Then what the hell was all that talk about the half-orc crunch? You trying to bluff you have any idea what you are talking about Pathfinder and failing miserably?

Because you brought it up, boy. Do keep up with your own stupidity.

I was giving this game the thumbs down for WEEKS, ever since the backgrounds first came out.

 

[Zero Credibility]

... why the fuck am I arguing with a mentally challenged?

 

[Cael]

... why the fuck am I arguing with a mentally challenged?

I don't know. Why do you argue with yourself?

 

[Tacgnol]

... why the fuck am I arguing with a mentally challenged?

He clearly has no idea about Pathfinder. He keeps bring up 3.5 stuff, like d4 hitdice.

It's almost like two different tabletop RPGs might have different balance.

 

[Cael]

... why the fuck am I arguing with a mentally challenged?

He clearly has no idea about Pathfinder. He keeps bring up 3.5 stuff, like d4 hitdice.

It's almost like two different tabletop RPGs might have different balance.

Pathfinder billed itself as DnD 3.75, actually. An expansion of 3.5 with various... "balances"... in place. I was there when it first started, when it was trying to gain recognition as a game in its own right and just before 4th Ed blew DnD up as a franchise.

Shock horror. Paizo lied.

 

[Daemongar]

As long as this game makes me feel like I'm sitting at a table surrounded by purple haired lesbian fatties, morons, 12 year olds, 2 or 3 people in a conversation not paying attention, and a DM that tries to force politics into the game, that is, as long as the game mirrors every one of my many Pathfinder experiences, who cares what class I play?

 

[DexRiwus]

...

Pathfinder Kingmaker. The clue to what we should be talking about is in the title of the thread. You come in here and say that you will not be playing it because of orc wizards. I try to politely figure out what the fuck are you on about, get more nonsense in return. So, tell me, what the fuck is your point if you are not even talking about Pathfinder at all? That you hate this game because someone, somewhere made an orc wizard in a different system? Do say, I would like to know how deep this idiocy goes.

No, fucktard. I hate the game because it is a dramafag game as evidenced by the emotard vomit that passes for "background" of the various NPCs, the most eregious of which is the half-orc "I am so aaaaangry! Feel my angst at 10000 paces!"

You and that half-orc have much in common then.

 

[DexRiwus]

What is alchemist about? Not playing him myself, because there already is a must-have companion in the game, but would like to know what is his deal.

 

[PEACH]

Ask me about BattleTech Dragon Age Pathfinder

 

[Life of the Party]

ERYFKRAD is our local barbarian expert.

 

[ERYFKRAD]

I'm wondering what other classes I should roll along with the Barbarian.

 

[Life of the Party]

 

[bataille]

I'm wondering what other classes I should roll along with the Barbarian.

An ELVEN FEMALE barbarian, to give you sideglances while raging amidst the carnage. Talk about awkward and uncomfortable!

 

[ERYFKRAD]

ELVEN

Buddy you need The Emperor's Mercy help.
One barbarian is usually enough.

 

[Darkzone]

In my class analysis of the D&D 3.5 edition, the value of classes based on SP, HP and Damage potential and etc were in the following order:
Druid~Barbarian> Ranger> Paladin> Cleric>....> Fighter. Monk gains a lot, if you have psi abilities and classes and you go for the Psi-Fist feats. But Pathfinder tries to balance exactly this as i have seen with the Fighter class in comparison to other classes.
Human-Barbarian is a neat-choice. Or perhaps Human- Fighter or Wizard or Half-Elf Paladin?

 

[Theldaran]

In my class analysis of the D&D 3.5 edition,

INVALID ARGUMENT

 

[Serus]

I'll pick the "when they make a proper turn based game" class.

 

[Darkzone]

In my class analysis of the D&D 3.5 edition,

INVALID ARGUMENT

Not for your lack of reading comprehension skills. Therefore i will write it again for you: But Pathfinder tries to balance exactly this (this = the classes towards each other ) as i have seen with the Fighter class in comparison to other classes.

 

[Theldaran]

In my class analysis of the D&D 3.5 edition,

INVALID ARGUMENT

Not for your lack of reading comprehension skills. Therefore i will write it again for you: But Pathfinder tries to balance exactly this (this = the classes towards each other ) as i have seen with the Fighter class in comparison to other classes.

Why should I care about a post that starts with "In D&D3.5"... on a PATHFINDER game thread?

Literally, you start off with a table of most powerful classes in 3.5 and why should I even give a shit?

 

[Draugir101]

right now I am considering 1 lvl monk dips, then put the rest of the levels in rogue knifemaster. Alternatively I could explore that duelist fighter class.

 

[Theldaran]

Are there prestige classes confirmed? I seem to recall there are.

 

[deuxhero]

One of the companions was supposed to be setup for Arcane Trickster, so yes.

 

[Kruno]

I really wish King Comrade was a class.