Azira
Arcane
Yep. I think The Respublica is pretty much doomed by now. I'd be happy to be proven wrong though. But it seems that every other time we vote for something, we go back on some decision we made in our past.
treave said:You can lay the blame on the "I didn't vote for a theocracy so I want it to fail!" faction.
Have a little faithAzira said:Yep. I think The Respublica is pretty much doomed by now. I'd be happy to be proven wrong though. But it seems that every other time we vote for something, we go back on some decision we made in our past.
treave said:You can lay the blame on the "I didn't vote for a theocracy so I want it to fail!" faction.
root said:can somebody explain to me exactly what is the benefit of hit-n-run in outer space?
The Barbarian said:They could not hope to hold Sonata, removed as they were from their logistical network. Seemingly in dribs and drabs, the fleet that had weeks before won a major victory against the Commonwealth dissipated. There was obviously some disagreement in that fleet's hierarchy regarding how to best respond to the disastrous developments in question. Local observers even noted that several skirmishes took place, destroying upwards of ten Hin'in vessels.
Sun Tzu said:Thus if I determine the enemy's disposition of force while I have no perceptible form, I can concentrate my forces while the enemy is fragmented. If we are concentrated into a single force while they are fragmented into ten, then we attack them with ten times their strength. Thus we are many and the enemy is few. If we can attack their few with our many, those whom we engage in battle will be severly constrained.
The location where we will engage the enemy must not become known to them. If it is not known, then the positions they must prepare to defend will be numerous. If the positions the enemy prepares to defend are numerous, then the forces we will engage will be few. If no positions are left undefended, there will not be any places with more than a few.
Sun Tzu said:Critically analyse them to know the estimations for gain and loss. Stimulate them to know the patterns of their movement and stopping. Determine their disposition of force to know the tenable and fatal terrain. Probe them to know where they have an excess, where an insufficiency.
Thus the pinnacle of military deployment approaches the formless. If it is formless, then even the deepest spy cannot discern it or the wise make plans against it.
In accord with the enemy's disposition we impose measures on the masses that produce victory, but the masses are unable to fathom them. Men all know the disposition by which we attain victory, but no one knows the configuration through which we control the victory. Thus a victorious battle strategy is not repeated, the configurations of response to the enemy are inexhaustible.
herostratus said:D sounds like a shit option IMO, hit and run attacks against the enemy that, as langqlongguy pointed out, just conquered the masters of hit and run is p. silly.
Vote C
How much intel do we have on the Hi'in fleet placements in the area? Do we have estimates on how many ships are active in the theatre, and how much resistence we can expect at the staging point?