Catacombs
Arcane
- Joined
- Aug 10, 2017
- Messages
- 6,122
Nah, man. The C programming language only.What is that supposed to mean?
We're narrowing down the definition of RPG. It must be programmed in c++.
Nah, man. The C programming language only.What is that supposed to mean?
We're narrowing down the definition of RPG. It must be programmed in c++.
Assembly like how games were made decades ago.Nah, man. The C programming language only.What is that supposed to mean?
We're narrowing down the definition of RPG. It must be programmed in c++.
Too archaic for Lil's tastes. Peaks 90s/00s RPGs weren't made in assembly.Assembly like how games were made decades ago.
Assembly like how games were made decades ago.Nah, man. The C programming language only.What is that supposed to mean?
We're narrowing down the definition of RPG. It must be programmed in c++.
KotOR II is the worst, though. Imagine taking its writing seriously. Stupid storyfags.
Writing is the only reason to even touch MotB
KotOR II is the worst, though. Imagine taking its writing seriously. Stupid storyfags.
But you can become a Sith Lord and use force since early game. Just kidding. Kotor 1 is better but 2 still a good game.
Writing is the only reason to even touch MotB
The OC of NWN2 isn't bad either(not saying that is good as MotB)
Tell that to the Museum of Modern Arts. Clearly your opinion is so much more authoritative than theirs.
I tried playing oc, but gave up very quickly after encountering neeshka
but is my opinion.
but is my opinion.
Why should anyone care about your opinion when a literal game is displayed in a literal art museum in NY? Do you know what a fact is? Here, let me help you out once again:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fact
Learning life with uncle Grimwulf.
90% of art museums
Games are not art, nor is modern so-called art, and that's not an opinion. Its a fact. You are a retard, and you've lost any credibility. Cut off your balls if you haven't already and stick your head in a wood chipper.but is my opinion.
Why should anyone care about your opinion when a literal game is displayed in a literal art museum in NY? Do you know what a fact is? Here, let me help you out once again:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fact
Learning life with uncle Grimwulf.
You uncultured philistine how dare you!??!! If I want to stick my penis mayonnaise, its goddamn art! Do you even know what art is? I'll google it for you. Here's wikipedia to tell you for me what art is: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ArtHaving actually been to MoMA, I can tell you it's pure shit. One of their "art" pieces was a room painted yellow.
I tried playing oc, but gave up very quickly after encountering neeshka
90% of art museums
Aaand we have another one! Moar basic education incoming:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Museum_of_Modern_Art
Google and Reading are your friends, people. Use them. You will appear smarter, or at least not as stupid.
I tried playing oc, but gave up very quickly after encountering neeshka
What a pity. You missed out on the best companion, Qara.
Having actually been to MoMA, I can tell you it's pure shit. One of their "art" pieces was a room painted yellow.
Games are not art, nor is modern so-called art, and that's not an opinion. Its a fact. You are a retard, and you've lost any credibility. Cut off your balls if you haven't already and stick your head in a wood chipper.
Appeal to authority - not a very strong rebuttal. Art is simply great craftsmanship, so I do think games could be art; no matter what some committee or organization thinks. A well-written argument in favor of a game as art (or, of the game being simply superior) is more convincing than a web-page from an art-history museum.Games are not art.
Tell that to the Museum of Modern Arts. Clearly your opinion is so much more authoritative than theirs.
Ok. As long as you don't think games are art.I an not saying that games are art, only that games can contain art
Nah this is bullshit. Art without standards is worthless garbage. Before the 1950s, art was understood to be a display of talent and beauty. Then that standard got (((subverted))) and now art is whatever the artist wants it to be. A pile of shit is art! This post is art! Me snoring last night was art!Having actually been to MoMA, I can tell you it's pure shit. One of their "art" pieces was a room painted yellow.
Whether one likes art or not is another question entirely. From a certain point of view, art doesn't need to be qualified or even shown to anybody in order to be a piece of art. From that same point of view, everything could be qualified as art. Life coach could see his own shit as art.
I might not even glance towards the yellow room you mentioned, but I have enough brains to acknowledge that it's art for someone. If people refused to accept new art mediums, we would be stuck with cave engravings to this day. Some of those new mediums might appear mighty weird to me, then again - so was music to someone in the past. Some prehistoric life coach, sperging about music "not being art, only parts of the music, like words or musical notes are".
Appeal to authority
Art without standards is worthless garbage.
now art is whatever the artist wants it to be
I get your point, but it's not a great point. Take what Prime Junta argued in the RPG GOTY thread, he claimed that DE is an RPG because it won an RPG award...so, now Dwarf Fortress is art because it's in an art museum? Let's just leave the definition of "art" to a really high objective standard of craftsmanship.I may not like anything displayed in MoMA, or any other art museum for that matter, but it's an art museum, which, by definition, displays art.
Who cares about the museum man...Are you running a museum of your own?