- Joined
- May 29, 2010
- Messages
- 36,762
when one editor told our studio to “fuck off,” he later explained it was because he cared so much and that was why his reaction was so strong.
I need to see the context for this one.
when one editor told our studio to “fuck off,” he later explained it was because he cared so much and that was why his reaction was so strong.
when one editor told our studio to “fuck off,” he later explained it was because he cared so much and that was why his reaction was so strong.
I need to see the context for this one.
That would be a total disaster, and I'm not talking about TB vs RT.I would love to see Obsidian - Paizo - Paradox churn out a series of Turn-Based Pathfinder games
Fixed that for you. That would be awesome.
Meanwhile in the real world: PoE sells more than W2 and Shadowrun combined.They really shot themselves in the foot going safe with PoE instead of Tormenting, while inXile and Harebrained Schemes established control over weird and techy settings and gameplay.
Meanwhile in the real world: That one trick is loved by gamers still to this day.They've cornered themselves into being a one-trick poney, and that trick's been done to death.
I don't think you understand what 'playing it safe' means. T:ToN got funded within a matter of hours because they were able to use the Torment trademark (something similar applies to SRR with the Shadowrun franchise). Would an Obsidian-kickstarted all new IP (without the backing of a succesful franchise/critically acllaimed game) do as well? I wouldn't be so sure.That would be a total disaster, and I'm not talking about TB vs RT.
Obsidian'd be stuck doing fantasy shit for all their RPGs, aside from their MMOs and maybe AAA slamdunks. Plus, PoE vs Pathfinder, that sounds like competing against yourself.
If they do that, they're dead (to me anyways - fuck typical BG-style fantasy stories). They really shot themselves in the foot going safe with PoE instead of Tormenting, while inXile and Harebrained Schemes established control over weird and techy settings and gameplay. They've cornered themselves into being a one-trick poney, and that trick's been done to death.
Right.Meanwhile at the Codex: herp derp, I don't like their game, so the game flops and everyone hates it.
Playing it safe ultimately wasn't so safe for them, since they have now the option do double up on fantasy with PoE and Pathfinder, which is not as good as 2 distinct franchises/settings. Maybe playing it less safe would have given them more options, and been more safe in the long term (bigger audience, change of pace for designers/artists). I was surprised they went for BG/PoE instead of Torment for the kickstarter, and playing to their strengths.I don't think you understand what 'playing it safe' means. T:ToN got funded within a matter of hours because they were able to use the Torment trademark (something similar applies to SRR with the Shadowrun franchise). Would an Obsidian-kickstarted all new IP (without the backing of a succesful franchise/critically acllaimed game) do as well? I wouldn't be so sure.
InXile owns the Torment trademark. Which was my point - you gave Harebrained and InXile as examples of how 'not playing it safe' can be lucrative, when relying on existing franchises/trademarks is very much playing it safe.Playing it safe ultimately wasn't so safe for them, since they have now the option do double up on fantasy with PoE and Pathfinder, which is not as good as 2 distinct franchises/settings. Maybe playing it less safe would have given them more options, and been more safe in the long term (bigger audience, change of pace for designers/artists). I was surprised they went for BG/PoE instead of Torment for the kickstarter, and playing to their strengths.I don't think you understand what 'playing it safe' means. T:ToN got funded within a matter of hours because they were able to use the Torment trademark (something similar applies to SRR with the Shadowrun franchise). Would an Obsidian-kickstarted all new IP (without the backing of a succesful franchise/critically acllaimed game) do as well? I wouldn't be so sure.
Well, I/we don't know if InXile did own the trademark when PoE's kickstarter lauched. Anybody knows?InXile owns the Torment trademark. Which was my point - you gave Harebrained and InXile as examples of how 'not playing it safe' can be lucrative, when relying on existing franchises/trademarks is very much playing it safe.
just rpgcodexing on rpgcodexWhy don't we wait and see what Obsidian's next Kickstarted game is before making accusations eh
Let's proceed to speculate about what side of Gamergate she's on anyway!there's new Obsidian personnel on twitterino https://twitter.com/bree3
no idea who it is, what she does, or what she's working on
Why don't we wait and see what Obsidian's next Kickstarted game is before making accusations eh
She has pink hair so...Let's proceed to speculate about what side of Gamergate she's on anyway!there's new Obsidian personnel on twitterino https://twitter.com/bree3
no idea who it is, what she does, or what she's working on
I need to see the context for this one.