Putting the 'role' back in role-playing games since 2002.
Donate to Codex
Good Old Games
  • Welcome to rpgcodex.net, a site dedicated to discussing computer based role-playing games in a free and open fashion. We're less strict than other forums, but please refer to the rules.

    "This message is awaiting moderator approval": All new users must pass through our moderation queue before they will be able to post normally. Until your account has "passed" your posts will only be visible to yourself (and moderators) until they are approved. Give us a week to get around to approving / deleting / ignoring your mundane opinion on crap before hassling us about it. Once you have passed the moderation period (think of it as a test), you will be able to post normally, just like all the other retards.

Microsoft buys Activision Blizzard

:Flash:

Arcane
Joined
Apr 9, 2013
Messages
6,762
I give this a 0% chance of making it past antitrust.

I'm not even going to pay attention to this gig. NVIDIA buying ARM was the last big deal like this, and this seems like an even more clear cut case of antitrust.

There's no point speculating about what Microsoft will do, it's going to be an 18 month antitrust review followed by a denial.

Short Activision.
When was the last time antitrust blocked anything? In the 90s? Having Megacoroporations is seen as geopolitically relevant nowadays. It's better to have the international megacorporation in your own country than in a competing one.
All they have to do is say "you don't want gaming to be owned by the Japanese and the Chinese, do you?", and they'll get an extra billion in subsidies as a support for this merger.

NVIDIA ARM is being blocked. That's my read on the direction of antitrust.
But ARM is a UK company, and it's being blocked by the UK. The UK not wanting to lose its only chip manufacturer of importance does not disprove my point of antitrust being only important as a geopolitical concept. US antitrust would never have blocked the acquisition of ARM.
 

FreeKaner

Prophet of the Dumpsterfire
Joined
Mar 28, 2015
Messages
6,942
Location
Devlet-i ʿAlīye-i ʿErdogānīye
image.png


https://www.eurogamer.net/articles/...ed-to-leave-once-microsoft-deal-closes-report

He is being discarded now that his job to devalue and destabilize is done, just a loose end for microsoft.
 

Zarniwoop

TESTOSTERONIC As Fuck™
Patron
Joined
Nov 29, 2010
Messages
19,233
Shadorwun: Hong Kong
My problem with Gamepass is that it changes pricing power from the developer to Microsoft that can do what the fuck it wants. Nowadays any game that wants to be on steam is in there and can charge as much as the developers want for it. With gamepass, Microsoft controls developer revenues directly what gives them alot of leverage.

Not a problem since Microsoft IS a lot of the developers now and will soon be all of them.

Their technological distinctiveness will be added to the Microsoft collective. Resistance is futile.
 

1451

Seeker
In My Safe Space
Joined
Jan 1, 2011
Messages
1,382
WTFBBQ.

Who is going to buy Steam? M$ or Dizney?
No, Valve is a privately held company and Gabe Newell, its CEO, wants to keep it that way: TIL that Valve refuses to become a publicly traded company because they don't want to have their products influenced by people who fund them
 
Joined
Jan 14, 2018
Messages
50,754
Codex Year of the Donut
If Valve and Microsoft had a friendly relationship they wouldn't have spent the past 5 years doing everything they can to create a backup plan & deterrence for Microsoft shitting on them.
 

Gibson

Savant
Joined
Jun 23, 2019
Messages
423
the sad thing abiut this is, that people are actually looking at Microsoft as a savior (of sorts) of Blizzard and their Portfolio.
blizzard has sunken so low, that Microsoft, yes Microsoft!!, is seen as this good company that's about to turn the whole thing around and cater to gamers.
 

Hobo Elf

Arcane
Joined
Feb 17, 2009
Messages
14,154
Location
Platypus Planet
My problem with Gamepass is that it changes pricing power from the developer to Microsoft that can do what the fuck it wants. Nowadays any game that wants to be on steam is in there and can charge as much as the developers want for it. With gamepass, Microsoft controls developer revenues directly what gives them alot of leverage.

How is this any different than what publishers do now? They've always been in charge of developer revenue unless you're indie.

Now imagine that all those people that buy games and dont get past the first act, now, dont need to impulse buy games on steam anymore? You know, the guy that bought a game and didnt finish Act 1 paid the same as the guy that played 1000 hs, I doubt Microsoft would keep things working like thist as it doesnt benefit their interests that is keeping people playing and they wont pay for an indie dev the equivalent of a full sale for a guy that played 30 mins of it.

We don't know what kind of contracts developers have with Microsoft concerning the gamepass. But so far anything that's on gamepass can also sold elsewhere therefore we can count the gamepass as extra revenue for the developers rather than a constraint.
 

Bohrain

Liturgist
Patron
Joined
Aug 10, 2016
Messages
1,486
Location
norf
My team has the sexiest and deadliest waifus you can recruit.
WTFBBQ.

Who is going to buy Steam? M$ or Dizney?
No, Valve is a privately held company and Gabe Newell, its CEO, wants to keep it that way: TIL that Valve refuses to become a publicly traded company because they don't want to have their products influenced by people who fund them

For now at least. Apparently Gaben's son has zero interest in the company and if he inherits it he'll probably sell it to fund his racing career.
 

Hag

Arbiter
Patron
Joined
Nov 25, 2020
Messages
2,306
Location
Breizh
Codex Year of the Donut Codex+ Now Streaming! Enjoy the Revolution! Another revolution around the sun that is.
the sad thing abiut this is, that people are actually looking at Microsoft as a savior (of sorts) of Blizzard and their Portfolio.
blizzard has sunken so low, that Microsoft, yes Microsoft!!, is seen as this good company that's about to turn the whole thing around and cater to gamers.
The amount and quality of PR done by Microsoft since Satya Nadella is astounding. Gates was despised (if kind of respected) by every actor in the sector and Microsoft was the de-facto name for ruthless stomping business practice (even creating the successful "M$" nick that everybody recognizes). Ballmer was seen as a clown and there was good hopes he would drive Microsoft to the ground. Don't know how much is true. Enters Nadella, and within a few years Microsoft is everybody's best friend and no longer a slur.
 

Tacgnol

Shitlord
Patron
Joined
Oct 12, 2010
Messages
1,871,883
Codex 2016 - The Age of Grimoire Grab the Codex by the pussy RPG Wokedex Strap Yourselves In Codex Year of the Donut Shadorwun: Hong Kong Divinity: Original Sin 2 Steve gets a Kidney but I don't even get a tag. Pathfinder: Wrath I helped put crap in Monomyth
WTFBBQ.

Who is going to buy Steam? M$ or Dizney?
No, Valve is a privately held company and Gabe Newell, its CEO, wants to keep it that way: TIL that Valve refuses to become a publicly traded company because they don't want to have their products influenced by people who fund them

For now at least. Apparently Gaben's son has zero interest in the company and if he inherits it he'll probably sell it to fund his racing career.

Gabe will probably just pass it to one of the other veterans when he wants to retire.

Robin Walker is often said to be his likely successor if he retires in the near future.
 

Zarniwoop

TESTOSTERONIC As Fuck™
Patron
Joined
Nov 29, 2010
Messages
19,233
Shadorwun: Hong Kong
the sad thing abiut this is, that people are actually looking at Microsoft as a savior (of sorts) of Blizzard and their Portfolio.
blizzard has sunken so low, that Microsoft, yes Microsoft!!, is seen as this good company that's about to turn the whole thing around and cater to gamers.
The amount and quality of PR done by Microsoft since Satya Nadella is astounding. Gates was despised (if kind of respected) by every actor in the sector and Microsoft was the de-facto name for ruthless stomping business practice (even creating the successful "M$" nick that everybody recognizes). Ballmer was seen as a clown and there was good hopes he would drive Microsoft to the ground. Don't know how much is true. Enters Nadella, and within a few years Microsoft is everybody's best friend and no longer a slur.

Wait until people actually start using the cancer that is Windows 11, we'll see if they're still a fan of the Poo-American.
 

Daedalos

Arcane
The Real Fanboy
Joined
Apr 18, 2007
Messages
5,610
Location
Denmark
Pretty sure this was a good move by Microsoft.

I can't really get any worse for Blizzard anyway, so yeah, Microsoft is gonna clean shit up, and BOBBY is definitely gonna get fucking fired for sure.

69 billion tho.. wtf.

hopefully this will course-correct the blizzard franchises... hopefully.
 

J_C

One Bit Studio
Patron
Developer
Joined
Dec 28, 2010
Messages
16,947
Location
Pannonia
Project: Eternity Wasteland 2 Shadorwun: Hong Kong Divinity: Original Sin 2 Steve gets a Kidney but I don't even get a tag. Pathfinder: Wrath
My problem with Gamepass is that it changes pricing power from the developer to Microsoft that can do what the fuck it wants. Nowadays any game that wants to be on steam is in there and can charge as much as the developers want for it. With gamepass, Microsoft controls developer revenues directly what gives them alot of leverage.

Now imagine that all those people that buy games and dont get past the first act, now, dont need to impulse buy games on steam anymore? You know, the guy that bought a game and didnt finish Act 1 paid the same as the guy that played 1000 hs, I doubt Microsoft would keep things working like thist as it doesnt benefit their interests that is keeping people playing and they wont pay for an indie dev the equivalent of a full sale for a guy that played 30 mins of it.
That is 100% is the case. But indie games are not affected by this, since they are created by 5-10 person studios which are not on Gamepass. And if MS wants to screw over big companies, all the power to them.
 

Caim

Arcane
Joined
Aug 1, 2013
Messages
17,419
Location
Dutchland
Gotta love the diversity with only two black people in the image, and I'm not even sure about the guy in the front and left, who might just be an American. The other guy's left of the black D&D shirt guy in the back.
 
Joined
Nov 23, 2017
Messages
4,633
Well it took Microsoft a long time, but they finally got some mascot characters in Crash Bandicoot and Spyro the Dragon. It's funny to think they now own some PSX era Sony mascots.

This could actually be a good thing. Now Microsoft owns Call of Duty, Halo, Overwatch, Doom, and whatever open world FPS Bethesda is putting out at the moment...they also own Quake, Wolfenstein, whatever FPS Arkane is doing at the moment, and while they haven't done anything with it directly lately they own MechWarrior too. Now that's a lot of first person shooters. And you might not want to be releasing, say, your big new Call of Duty right along side your big new Halo and your big new Doom. So maybe, maybe Call of Duty isn't a every year release anymore. And if Call of Duty isn't coming out every year anyone there's not any reason to have three main studios making the games with like two or three other studios cycling on backup work. So maybe this means Raven Software gets to make games again. Maybe those Dead Space guys at Sledgehammer get to do something beyond CoD now. It's only too bad this couldn't have happened like in 2009 before Activision went kill crazy on a bunch of developers.

Interesting development. Microsoft seems to be buying all video game developers.

Can someone explain how Arcanum was bought by Acti-Blizz?

Sierra was the publisher. Sierra was owned by Vivendi Games (formally Vivendi Universal) who also owned Blizzard. In 2008 Vivendi G and Activision merged and formed Activison Blizzard.

So they own all the old Sierra stuff now like Kings Quest, Police Quest, and Gabriel Knight.

What are the chances of Sony following suit with Japanese companies? Their just lost future CoDs after losing future Bethesda games. Acquiring Square Enix would for example give them all their popular JRPG IPs plus few viable Eidos IPs like Tomb Raider.

I'd guess zero. Sony Interactive shifted its focus to the west during the PS4 era, and just last year shut down Japan Studio. Although Japan Studio people were leaving before that; like that Silent Hill guy that'd been doing the Gravity Rush games recently already has a new independent studio and is making that Slitterhead game.

It seems more likely some other big Japanese company like Bandai Namco would do that. I'd actually expect Microsoft to throw money around like that in Japan more than Sony at this point. There was also that rumor last year Microsoft was buying Sega, which was something they were thinking about doing when they first entered the console market.
 

Daedalos

Arcane
The Real Fanboy
Joined
Apr 18, 2007
Messages
5,610
Location
Denmark
and BOBBY is definitely gonna get fucking fired for sure.
One of the most successful CEOs in human history. Kotick bought Activision for $500,000.
I'm sure he's devastated by the returns he's gotten, you guys really showed him.

I don't care if hes stinking rich, what I care about is the product. make good games, and u can earn trillions of dollars for all I care. just make good fucking games. that all I ask.

something good ol BOBBY wasnt able to see through.
 
Joined
Jan 14, 2018
Messages
50,754
Codex Year of the Donut
and BOBBY is definitely gonna get fucking fired for sure.
One of the most successful CEOs in human history. Kotick bought Activision for $500,000.
I'm sure he's devastated by the returns he's gotten, you guys really showed him.

I don't care if hes stinking rich, what I care about is the product. make good games, and u can earn trillions of dollars for all I care. just make good fucking games. that all I ask.

something good ol BOBBY wasnt able to see through.
the games his company made were good enough to be the most expensive video game company acquisition in history
 
Joined
Nov 23, 2017
Messages
4,633
I give this a 0% chance of making it past antitrust.

I'm not even going to pay attention to this gig. NVIDIA buying ARM was the last big deal like this, and this seems like an even more clear cut case of antitrust.

There's no point speculating about what Microsoft will do, it's going to be an 18 month antitrust review followed by a denial.

Short Activision.
When was the last time antitrust blocked anything? In the 90s? Having Megacoroporations is seen as geopolitically relevant nowadays. It's better to have the international megacorporation in your own country than in a competing one.
All they have to do is say "you don't want gaming to be owned by the Japanese and the Chinese, do you?", and they'll get an extra billion in subsidies as a support for this merger.

Yeah, the idea this gets blocked in antitrust is hilarious. If they didn't stop Disney from buying 21st Century Fox, they aren't stopping Microsoft from buying a video game company...which is a realm they seemingly have never given a shit about (despite all the money it makes) since video game companies owning their own digital storefronts sure seems a whole lot like the movie studios owning theatres thing they weren't allowed to do from 1948 - 2020. There's other giant video game studios, and Tencent is the largest video game studio in the world, they aren't stopping Microsoft from buying Activision.
 

Don Peste

Arcane
Joined
Sep 15, 2008
Messages
4,364
Location
||☆||
Why won't MS (or Embracer, anyone...) buy Interplay already? I wonder if it's a mix of uninterest for its remaining IPs + not having any dev studios + simple French greedyness...
 

As an Amazon Associate, rpgcodex.net earns from qualifying purchases.
Back
Top Bottom