Nah, this was just a highly attractive mix that at least some people who voted for either variant could actually agree on. It retains the traits of both that made us choose them in the first place.Maybe I should just combine all the backgrounds and motivations?
Does not work. Too much time spent on bettering oneself for such a lazy person.A lazy, orphaned noble with a materialistic streak but a righteous heart who was a child soldier that is picked up by a master swordsman, spending part of his training with the Order of the White Falcon, thanks to his master's connections, and his free time as an avid scholar on his own.
Does not work. Too much time spent on bettering oneself for such a lazy person.
Little will the world know that every single cunning plan and invention we use against them was originally made to spy on naked women. This will be glorious.I think you mean inventing a scrying orb with the same refractive index as water and installing them in all the bath houses so we can spy from the comfort of our armchair while overlording.
Uh-huh. I bet he is also fond of saying 'It's not like I love hard work, b-baka!' to himself.He's minimizing his long-term effort by studying how to be efficient.
His advisors will just have to learn to recite 'Overlording 101' while bathing. Problem solved.I'm fine with the DD/DDC archetypes in principle, but I think they will too easily lend themselves to an overlord who spends all his time spying on his advisors in the bath rather than, you know, overlording, especially in the Codex's hands.
We talking Treave here your objection is overruled.FTFY.Villains in bad fiction tend to be one sided and get defined in end by one trait that makes them who they are.
Even if they would not believe it such explanations its more likely heroes will hesitate to end good villains.Incidentally, the people you hear that thing from usually tend to be villains and anti-heroes.Someone who considers himself (or ends considering himself) beyond good and evil.
Still, I think any villain that you get to play is bound to look believable and realistic, since you would be the one making rationalizations for their actions.
You was truly influenced by a GREAT MAN. Evil yes, but GREAT and charismatic. There is nothing to be ashamed of.I guess I might have been influenced a little.General Tarquin: If I win - I get to be a king. If I lose, I get to be a legend.
DDC? The Slacker Pervert: You like women, you like money, you like success, but more than anything else, you like to expend effort thinking up ways to get all the lovely things you like without effort. They call you the most hardworking lazy scholar in the academy, but you prefer to think of it as minimizing effort in the long term.
I hope DDC isn't actually serious.