-
Welcome to rpgcodex.net, a site dedicated to discussing computer based role-playing games in a free and open fashion. We're less strict than other forums, but please refer to the rules.
"This message is awaiting moderator approval": All new users must pass through our moderation queue before they will be able to post normally. Until your account has "passed" your posts will only be visible to yourself (and moderators) until they are approved. Give us a week to get around to approving / deleting / ignoring your mundane opinion on crap before hassling us about it. Once you have passed the moderation period (think of it as a test), you will be able to post normally, just like all the other retards.
Did Warcraft III suck?
- Thread starter Ladders & Snakes
- Start date
Overweight Manatee
Scholar
- Joined
- Sep 4, 2009
- Messages
- 3,520
Marobug said:OP, do you at least know what "popamole" means ?
I can assure you, warcraft III is not a popamole
Blademaster is pretty popamole.
Excidium
P. banal
No way. In fact, Blademaster is the complete opposite of popamole.
Overweight Manatee
Scholar
- Joined
- Sep 4, 2009
- Messages
- 3,520
Blademaster launches an attack then goes invisible (=popping in and out of cover), uses potions/wells/etc to regenerate to full strength in a matter of seconds (lolol), spawns copies of himself (It isn't popamole without at least 3 identical enemies), and gets random crits (equivalent of random console headshots). His ultimate isn't really popamole, I would say it is a candidate for the A-A-Awesome button but thats a bit redundant since the point of ultimates is to fulfill that role.
Captain Shrek
Guest
Black_Willow said:
Explainez, s'il vous plait?
As an Amazon Associate, rpgcodex.net earns from qualifying purchases.