Putting the 'role' back in role-playing games since 2002.
Donate to Codex
Good Old Games
  • Welcome to rpgcodex.net, a site dedicated to discussing computer based role-playing games in a free and open fashion. We're less strict than other forums, but please refer to the rules.

    "This message is awaiting moderator approval": All new users must pass through our moderation queue before they will be able to post normally. Until your account has "passed" your posts will only be visible to yourself (and moderators) until they are approved. Give us a week to get around to approving / deleting / ignoring your mundane opinion on crap before hassling us about it. Once you have passed the moderation period (think of it as a test), you will be able to post normally, just like all the other retards.

Demote idonthavetimeforthiscrap

Demote idhtftc?

  • Yes

    Votes: 57 40.7%
  • No

    Votes: 83 59.3%

  • Total voters
    140
Repressed Homosexual
Joined
Mar 29, 2010
Messages
18,011
Location
Ottawa, Can.
It's called not safe for work pictures, not not safe for degenerates pictures. This picture contained bare breasts and yes it is explicit. If you browse a site and a picture of naked breasts suddenly comes up along with your boss, he's going to want to have a word with you.

This is you just coming up with more excuses to practice bias and drag your feet around, it's pathetic.

are we talking about the same forum? are you saying that you expect GD threads to never include a tubgirl link, a gif of some tranny or random gory pics out of nowhere?

More pulling my leg, stop with the BS. There is no special exclusion for GD in the rules, because you could accidentally stumble upon such a picture anywhere, anytime on this place. This was never meant as a foolproof solution, just as something to greatly reduce chances. And now you've decided not to do anything about this rule in GD unless absolutely constrained to. You didn't even remove ogrish pictures in a thread of mine. Stop being an hypocritical manbaby already.
 

Scruffy

Ex-janitor
Patron
Joined
May 16, 2008
Messages
18,150
Codex 2012 Torment: Tides of Numenera Codex USB, 2014
It's called not safe for work pictures, not not safe for degenerates pictures. This picture contained bare breasts and yes it is explicit. If you browse a site and a picture of naked breasts suddenly comes up along with your boss, he's going to want to have a word with you.

This is you just coming up with more excuses to practice bias and drag your feet around, it's pathetic.

are we talking about the same forum? are you saying that you expect GD threads to never include a tubgirl link, a gif of some tranny or random gory pics out of nowhere?

More pulling my leg, stop with the BS. There is no special exclusion for GD in the rules, because you could accidentally stumble upon such a picture anywhere, anytime on this place. This was never meant as a foolproof solution, just as something to greatly reduce chances. And now you've decided not to do anything about this rule in GD unless absolutely constrained to. You didn't even remove ogrish pictures in a thread of mine. Stop being an hypocritical manbaby already.

you keep referring to "the rules", apparently ignoring that the rules say that

"As with all rules we have an exception, and that is that trick linking to such images / sites is perfectly fine and highly encouraged (refer to this thread for further information). People do need to learn that this is the internet after all."


still waiting for the faggot to reply to this

Established tradition.

Or, you know, for a recent example, the case where Commisar D. and skyway both posted threads about the same thing albeit in different subforums, and those two were merged. A merger which you were directly involved in and I even remember insulting you in that thread for "LULZ HAHAHAHAHAHAH CHANGING THE THREAD NAME CUZ UR A MODERATOR AND STUFF!!!!!1111"

idhtftc you are seriously stupid beyond compare.

as for you, "Each of the forums also has a number of moderators who are responsible for ensuring the place doesn't go full retard. Their job is to ensure the rules are followed and generally annoy you as part of the Codex experience."

Seriously, if you want to refer to the rules, learn them first.
 

LundB

Mistakes were made.
Joined
Jan 2, 2012
Messages
4,160
idont, to be fair, posting nsfw stuff in image tags and posting a trick link are two very different things. One makes a Codex page not marked as such visually NSFW, the other leads some poor sap to an off-site NSFW experience. And while it might not be entirely advisable to browse GD at work, there isn't any explicit exception made for it.

Or, you know, for a recent example, the case where Commisar D. and skyway both posted threads about the same thing albeit in different subforums, and those two were merged. A merger which you were directly involved in and I even remember insulting you in that thread for "LULZ HAHAHAHAHAHAH CHANGING THE THREAD NAME CUZ UR A MODERATOR AND STUFF!!!!!1111"

idhtftc you are seriously stupid beyond compare.

Actually Cloaked Figure, I changed the thread's name to get his attention after I moved it from Poli to GD, so that he'd get around to merging it quickly. I sort of expected the thread it was merged with to be the one it was titled as, but in the end the rename is sorta my fault.
 

Scruffy

Ex-janitor
Patron
Joined
May 16, 2008
Messages
18,150
Codex 2012 Torment: Tides of Numenera Codex USB, 2014
Actually Cloaked Figure, I changed the thread's name to get his attention after I moved it from Poli to GD, so that he'd get around to merging it quickly. I sort of expected the thread it was merged with to be the one it was titled as, but in the end the rename is sorta my fault.
and the lazy merging is a continuation and the result of said title. because people who take things too seriously die sad and forgotten.
 
Repressed Homosexual
Joined
Mar 29, 2010
Messages
18,011
Location
Ottawa, Can.
idont, to be fair, posting nsfw stuff in image tags and posting a trick link are two very different things. One makes a Codex page not marked as such visually NSFW, the other leads some poor sap to an off-site NSFW experience. And while it might not be entirely advisable to browse GD at work, there isn't any explicit exception made for it.

Not even able to understand the difference between the two.

It's ok idont... we know you're a bit slow, don't worry... we're known and accepted you for who you are a long time ago, since you make it so obvious every time you post...
 
Repressed Homosexual
Joined
Mar 29, 2010
Messages
18,011
Location
Ottawa, Can.
idont, to be fair, posting nsfw stuff in image tags and posting a trick link are two very different things.
sure. they both still happen in GD is what i'm saying. GD is not GRPG.

Are you for real? "People need to learn that this is the Internet after all" refers to trick linking only. Stop pulling BS out of nowhere to justify your incompetence and pettiness.
 

Scruffy

Ex-janitor
Patron
Joined
May 16, 2008
Messages
18,150
Codex 2012 Torment: Tides of Numenera Codex USB, 2014
refers to trick linking only.
As I said. GD is not GRPG. It's not a "normal" forum. it's the shit forum where non-rpgs related stuff is brought up and everyone dicks around. It's the forum where SMA posts dick pics, where resident stalkers show off how creepy they are, where holocaust deniers go on rants about their crackpot theories, where local deviants ask trannies to shit on them, and so on. IF you expect GD to be a SFW part of the site, i'm afraid we have different ideas about the forum.

Unless you are referring to the "annoy you" part
fucking finally
 

Infinitron

I post news
Patron
Staff Member
Joined
Jan 28, 2011
Messages
99,662
Codex Year of the Donut Serpent in the Staglands Dead State Divinity: Original Sin Project: Eternity Torment: Tides of Numenera Wasteland 2 Shadorwun: Hong Kong Divinity: Original Sin 2 A Beautifully Desolate Campaign Pillars of Eternity 2: Deadfire Pathfinder: Kingmaker Pathfinder: Wrath I'm very into cock and ball torture I helped put crap in Monomyth
I think Idont is a pretty cool guy. eh doesn't have tiem for this crap and doesn't afraid of anything
 

Scruffy

Ex-janitor
Patron
Joined
May 16, 2008
Messages
18,150
Codex 2012 Torment: Tides of Numenera Codex USB, 2014
i already explained why i retardoed that thread. threads about funny names and miss bum bum ARE retarded. My principles remained the same since i've been made a mod: only intervene on blatant NSFW stuff not spoilered or in a non-NSFW marked thread and avoid duplicates as much as possible. Do this in some sort-of-humorous way (like LUndb's merging request) when possible. Also, be lazy.

You opened a thread that had already been opened. Irregardless of the fact that you knew it or not, my policy has always been to keep the oldest one. I only merge when there's something of value to merge. Read the "replies" to your thread. Not merging that stuff.

I understand that you are butthurt because you believe that your stuff is special and worthy of praise, but it really isn't.
 

Crispy

I feel... young!
Patron
Staff Member
Joined
Feb 16, 2008
Messages
1,877,270
Location
Future Wasteland
Strap Yourselves In
Moderating GD is a truly thankless job.

Despite whatever sterling reputation you had previously earned, once you are made a mod, everyone instantly despises and targets you. Friends become enemies. Enemies become stalkers. You can't seem to do anything right, and no matter how much you try to please everyone, everything you touch instead turns to shit.

You lose sleep. You break out into cold sweats sometimes. Thoughts of suicide frequently enter the equation.

But, I do not regret my time of service as Sheriff. Hardened became my soul from it. Steeled my will was. I bore the brunt of the barrage and came out of it intact, if not more wisened due to the experience. There are things that I learned, arcane things, that would eventually aid me in my long-term endeavors. What really happened to Phelot, for example. What type of underwear Crooked Bee wears. Those kind of things.

I know that star still sits there provocatively on DU's desk. It hasn't been picked up by someone else, for there was only ever one Sheriff. As I stand in the corner, eyeing it casually on occasion, do I think about walking over and picking it up again?

Maybe someday...
 
Repressed Homosexual
Joined
Mar 29, 2010
Messages
18,011
Location
Ottawa, Can.
refers to trick linking only.
As I said. GD is not GRPG. It's not a "normal" forum. it's the shit forum where non-rpgs related stuff is brought up and everyone dicks around. It's the forum where SMA posts dick pics, where resident stalkers show off how creepy they are, where holocaust deniers go on rants about their cracpot theories, where local deviants ask trannies to shit on them, and so on. IF you expect GD to be a SFW part of the site, i'm afraid we have different ideas about the forum.

That's your personal taste, that has nothing to do with the rules. The rule about IMG tags applies across the whole site, as has been made clear many times already.

And even that part about only removing extreme NSFW pictures is BS, you refused to remove spammed ogrish pictures in my thread just because it was me who made the request and it was in my thread. You're full of crap.

As I said. GD is not GRPG. It's not a "normal" forum. it's the shit forum where non-rpgs related stuff is brought up and everyone dicks around. It's the forum where SMA posts dick pics, where resident stalkers show off how creepy they are, where holocaust deniers go on rants about their crackpot theories, where local deviants ask trannies to shit on them, and so on. IF you expect GD to be a SFW part of the site, i'm afraid we have different ideas about the forum.

But you still feel the need to retardo threads about Cracked.com*, as well as adding "retardo" tags to threads about Bulletproof Tuxedos and negroes with funny names. It's interesting how your arguments and principles seem to change based on whatever behavior you are currently apologizing for.

* I wonder if you write articles for them, you seem the type.

He's David Wong on there.
 

Scruffy

Ex-janitor
Patron
Joined
May 16, 2008
Messages
18,150
Codex 2012 Torment: Tides of Numenera Codex USB, 2014
You lose sleep. You break out into cold sweats sometimes. Thoughts of suicide frequently enter the equation.

happens to me all the time man

you refused to remove spammed ogrish pictures in my thread just because it was me who made the request
more precisely, because you kept reporting bullshit as "offensive" even when it were puppets, so i just started ignoring you.
 

Whisky

The Solution
Joined
Feb 22, 2012
Messages
8,555
Location
Banjoville, British Columbia
Divinity: Original Sin Project: Eternity Torment: Tides of Numenera
CF's complaint about his topic is small-scale and mostly unimportant.

However, we do need to come to an Administrative consensus on NSFW on GD. It is meant to be a shithole, but if we allow unmarked NSFW, it should be in the board description. Either that are we start spoilering images more efficiently.
 

dibens

as seen on shoutbox
Patron
Joined
Dec 4, 2011
Messages
2,629
It's one of the natural laws of the codex- once someone who complains about a GD moderator gets banned, someone else must take his place. Cloaked Figure can't help it, he's just another victim of the never-ending cycle of butthurt and dumbfuckery.
 

Scruffy

Ex-janitor
Patron
Joined
May 16, 2008
Messages
18,150
Codex 2012 Torment: Tides of Numenera Codex USB, 2014
However, we do need to come to an Administrative consensus on NSFW on GD. It is meant to be a shithole, but if we allow unmarked NSFW, it should be in the board description. Either that are we start spoilering images more efficiently.

I might, of course, be wrong on my assessment of the nature of GD. I'm not saying that rules don't apply. I'm just saying that if you merrily browse GD at work and expect everything to go smoothly, maybe you didn't understand GD.
 

Whisky

The Solution
Joined
Feb 22, 2012
Messages
8,555
Location
Banjoville, British Columbia
Divinity: Original Sin Project: Eternity Torment: Tides of Numenera
However, we do need to come to an Administrative consensus on NSFW on GD. It is meant to be a shithole, but if we allow unmarked NSFW, it should be in the board description. Either that are we start spoilering images more efficiently.

I might, of course, be wrong on my assessment of the nature of GD. I'm not saying that rules don't apply. I'm just saying that if you merrily browse GD at work and expect everything to go smoothly, maybe you didn't understand GD.

Of course browsing GD at work is dumb, but at least we can try to either give advance warning by changing the board description and make it official, thereby negating complaints, or we can respond to reports better. Personally, I would lost GD as a whole as NSFW, that way it's official at least and would require no extra work.
 

LundB

Mistakes were made.
Joined
Jan 2, 2012
Messages
4,160
CF's complaint about his topic is small-scale and mostly unimportant.

However, we do need to come to an Administrative consensus on NSFW on GD. It is meant to be a shithole, but if we allow unmarked NSFW, it should be in the board description. Either that are we start spoilering images more efficiently.
Yeah. My opinion is already pr much already known, I figure spoilering is fast and easy, and if efficiency is an issue, we can always throw more people at GD. I know for a fact Grunker and I have very little to do in Politics, and I'm sure the same is true for plenty of other subforums (for instance I dunno who mods the Gazebo, but I doubt many problems are caused there), so adding someone from one of them to lessen the GD workload isn't exactly impractical.

Obviously GD won't be completely safe all the time, but that's no reason to declare it blanket-NSFW. After all, one could just as easily say "If you merrily browse the Codex at work and expect everything to go smoothly, maybe you didn't understand the Codex", and we're not labeling the entire site NSFW.
 

As an Amazon Associate, rpgcodex.net earns from qualifying purchases.
Back
Top Bottom