Lhynn
Arcane
- Joined
- Aug 28, 2013
- Messages
- 9,962
That would be too glorious to happen.Just make me a moderator and get this shit over with.
That would be too glorious to happen.Just make me a moderator and get this shit over with.
It's called not safe for work pictures, not not safe for degenerates pictures. This picture contained bare breasts and yes it is explicit. If you browse a site and a picture of naked breasts suddenly comes up along with your boss, he's going to want to have a word with you.
This is you just coming up with more excuses to practice bias and drag your feet around, it's pathetic.
are we talking about the same forum? are you saying that you expect GD threads to never include a tubgirl link, a gif of some tranny or random gory pics out of nowhere?
It's called not safe for work pictures, not not safe for degenerates pictures. This picture contained bare breasts and yes it is explicit. If you browse a site and a picture of naked breasts suddenly comes up along with your boss, he's going to want to have a word with you.
This is you just coming up with more excuses to practice bias and drag your feet around, it's pathetic.
are we talking about the same forum? are you saying that you expect GD threads to never include a tubgirl link, a gif of some tranny or random gory pics out of nowhere?
More pulling my leg, stop with the BS. There is no special exclusion for GD in the rules, because you could accidentally stumble upon such a picture anywhere, anytime on this place. This was never meant as a foolproof solution, just as something to greatly reduce chances. And now you've decided not to do anything about this rule in GD unless absolutely constrained to. You didn't even remove ogrish pictures in a thread of mine. Stop being an hypocritical manbaby already.
still waiting for the faggot to reply to this
Established tradition.
Or, you know, for a recent example, the case where Commisar D. and skyway both posted threads about the same thing albeit in different subforums, and those two were merged. A merger which you were directly involved in and I even remember insulting you in that thread for "LULZ HAHAHAHAHAHAH CHANGING THE THREAD NAME CUZ UR A MODERATOR AND STUFF!!!!!1111"
idhtftc you are seriously stupid beyond compare.
Or, you know, for a recent example, the case where Commisar D. and skyway both posted threads about the same thing albeit in different subforums, and those two were merged. A merger which you were directly involved in and I even remember insulting you in that thread for "LULZ HAHAHAHAHAHAH CHANGING THE THREAD NAME CUZ UR A MODERATOR AND STUFF!!!!!1111"
idhtftc you are seriously stupid beyond compare.
I thought that was the job description...The moderator of GD should not be a butthurt pussy who retardo's and gives warnings based on his personal butthurt feelings.
and the lazy merging is a continuation and the result of said title. because people who take things too seriously die sad and forgotten.Actually Cloaked Figure, I changed the thread's name to get his attention after I moved it from Poli to GD, so that he'd get around to merging it quickly. I sort of expected the thread it was merged with to be the one it was titled as, but in the end the rename is sorta my fault.
idont, to be fair, posting nsfw stuff in image tags and posting a trick link are two very different things. One makes a Codex page not marked as such visually NSFW, the other leads some poor sap to an off-site NSFW experience. And while it might not be entirely advisable to browse GD at work, there isn't any explicit exception made for it.
sure. they both still happen in GD is what i'm saying. GD is not GRPG.idont, to be fair, posting nsfw stuff in image tags and posting a trick link are two very different things.
4. Thus it can be deduced that Idont retardo'd CF's thread because butthurt, not because rules.
Their job is to ensure the rules are followed and generally annoy you
sure. they both still happen in GD is what i'm saying. GD is not GRPG.idont, to be fair, posting nsfw stuff in image tags and posting a trick link are two very different things.
As I said. GD is not GRPG. It's not a "normal" forum. it's the shit forum where non-rpgs related stuff is brought up and everyone dicks around. It's the forum where SMA posts dick pics, where resident stalkers show off how creepy they are, where holocaust deniers go on rants about their crackpot theories, where local deviants ask trannies to shit on them, and so on. IF you expect GD to be a SFW part of the site, i'm afraid we have different ideas about the forum.refers to trick linking only.
fucking finallyUnless you are referring to the "annoy you" part
As I said. GD is not GRPG. It's not a "normal" forum. it's the shit forum where non-rpgs related stuff is brought up and everyone dicks around. It's the forum where SMA posts dick pics, where resident stalkers show off how creepy they are, where holocaust deniers go on rants about their cracpot theories, where local deviants ask trannies to shit on them, and so on. IF you expect GD to be a SFW part of the site, i'm afraid we have different ideas about the forum.refers to trick linking only.
As I said. GD is not GRPG. It's not a "normal" forum. it's the shit forum where non-rpgs related stuff is brought up and everyone dicks around. It's the forum where SMA posts dick pics, where resident stalkers show off how creepy they are, where holocaust deniers go on rants about their crackpot theories, where local deviants ask trannies to shit on them, and so on. IF you expect GD to be a SFW part of the site, i'm afraid we have different ideas about the forum.
But you still feel the need to retardo threads about Cracked.com*, as well as adding "retardo" tags to threads about Bulletproof Tuxedos and negroes with funny names. It's interesting how your arguments and principles seem to change based on whatever behavior you are currently apologizing for.
* I wonder if you write articles for them, you seem the type.
You lose sleep. You break out into cold sweats sometimes. Thoughts of suicide frequently enter the equation.
more precisely, because you kept reporting bullshit as "offensive" even when it were puppets, so i just started ignoring you.you refused to remove spammed ogrish pictures in my thread just because it was me who made the request
However, we do need to come to an Administrative consensus on NSFW on GD. It is meant to be a shithole, but if we allow unmarked NSFW, it should be in the board description. Either that are we start spoilering images more efficiently.
However, we do need to come to an Administrative consensus on NSFW on GD. It is meant to be a shithole, but if we allow unmarked NSFW, it should be in the board description. Either that are we start spoilering images more efficiently.
I might, of course, be wrong on my assessment of the nature of GD. I'm not saying that rules don't apply. I'm just saying that if you merrily browse GD at work and expect everything to go smoothly, maybe you didn't understand GD.
Yeah. My opinion is already pr much already known, I figure spoilering is fast and easy, and if efficiency is an issue, we can always throw more people at GD. I know for a fact Grunker and I have very little to do in Politics, and I'm sure the same is true for plenty of other subforums (for instance I dunno who mods the Gazebo, but I doubt many problems are caused there), so adding someone from one of them to lessen the GD workload isn't exactly impractical.CF's complaint about his topic is small-scale and mostly unimportant.
However, we do need to come to an Administrative consensus on NSFW on GD. It is meant to be a shithole, but if we allow unmarked NSFW, it should be in the board description. Either that are we start spoilering images more efficiently.