Cloaked Figure
Arcane
[edit]
Last edited:
look better, you have to click on the forums to do that, you can do this.The first one I posted came before liberal's thread. Your screen shot shows my second thread after you retardo'd the first one. Is this what passes for cunning in your homeland, you dipshit?
In any case another mod would have merged them since mine actually had replies, rather than retardoing it like a butthurt little faggot.
Doesn't glyphwright's posts have to pass through a moderator check?
look at the little nancy appeal to authority and hide behind his big forum moderating powers!
answer the question nancy boy do his posts have to pass a check before being posted?
not use it as a pretext to make life harder towards those I had a butthurt 7 years-old vendetta
Yea, so there was no way for me to know he already posted it
not use it as a pretext to make life harder towards those I had a butthurt 7 years-old vendetta
i actually received a report for CF thread, checked it, saw there was a double post for the same stuff and retardoed the newest one, as usual.
Yea, so there was no way for me to know he already posted it
Worry not, i fixed it.
because you report pictures in NSFW GD thread. and technically, all GD is NSFW.Funny you talk about reports, you throw every excuse under the book not to do anything and to drag your feet when I report NSFW pictures.
Dude are you trying to be DU or something? It's not working and you just look like a shrill and butthurt faggot to people who understand what went down with those threads. You retardo'd my shit not because of the content but because I was the one who posted it! Just suck a fucking dick and stop ruining GD with your faggotry.
but offense is never given, only taken. a naked body isn't offensive, in my opinion.Not true, the rules regarding NSFW material apply to all threads that don't explicitly contain a NSFW tag or a NSFW mention in the title because people don't want to accidentally stumble upon disgusting or offensive pictures out of the blue while they might have loved ones around. It's the very first rule of this place, and you're hypocritical in its application, among other situations such as this one.
It's the very first rule of this place, and you're hypocritical in its application, among other situations such as this one.
a naked body isn't offensive, in my opinion.
Actually normal protocol in this case would be to merge the threads, not retardo the one that actually had replies in it as opposed to the one that didn't. But keep trying to worm your way out of it, at least it shows me that you feel ashamed.
according to...Actually normal protocol in this case would be to merge the threads
but offense is never given, only taken. a naked body isn't offensive, in my opinion.Not true, the rules regarding NSFW material apply to all threads that don't explicitly contain a NSFW tag or a NSFW mention in the title because people don't want to accidentally stumble upon disgusting or offensive pictures out of the blue while they might have loved ones around. It's the very first rule of this place, and you're hypocritical in its application, among other situations such as this one.
and let's not forget that you reported as offensive a picture with Kermit "fucking" Miss Piggy
It's called not safe for work pictures, not not safe for degenerates pictures. This picture contained bare breasts and yes it is explicit. If you browse a site and a picture of naked breasts suddenly comes up along with your boss, he's going to want to have a word with you.
This is you just coming up with more excuses to practice bias and drag your feet around, it's pathetic.
It's called not safe for work pictures, not not safe for degenerates pictures. This picture contained bare breasts and yes it is explicit. If you browse a site and a picture of naked breasts suddenly comes up along with your boss, he's going to want to have a word with you.
This is you just coming up with more excuses to practice bias and drag your feet around, it's pathetic.