Better, than the test site, blander than the past.

[rusty_shackleford]

why does search default to relevant instead of date
makes finding shit difficult

 

[Jenkem]

why does search default to relevant instead of date

because:

makes finding shit difficult

 

[rusty_shackleford]

I don't even understand what "relevance" means in this context, how can it be more relevant than containing the words I searched for?
is this some google shit where they think they know what I want to search for and keep changing the terms I searched for on me giving me results I don't want?

 

[Peachcurl]

I don't even understand what "relevance" means in this context, how can it be more relevant than containing the words I searched for?
is this some google shit where they think they know what I want to search for and keep changing the terms I searched for on me giving me results I don't want?

It's just supposed to keep you occupied while the SWAT team breaks down your door.

 

[rusty_shackleford]

I don't even understand what "relevance" means in this context, how can it be more relevant than containing the words I searched for?
is this some google shit where they think they know what I want to search for and keep changing the terms I searched for on me giving me results I don't want?

It's just supposed to keep you occupied while the SWAT team breaks down your door.

why would I send them to my own address?

 

[Anthedon]

The Similar threads thingy that shows up below the Reply box is annoying.

 

[Taluntain]

I installed two new search addons that extend the search options, but they also overwrote some of the earlier configuration. It's not really clear where this is coming from now as I've disabled similar threads in like 5 places already.

 

[rusty_shackleford]

The Similar threads thingy that shows up below the Reply box is annoying.

add to your ublock "my filters":

rpgcodex.net##.view-thread.block--similarContents.block-container

 

[Taluntain]

I found it and disabled it, so no need. XF2 has yet another appearance config section for widgets that I haven't noticed before.

 

[Pink Eye]

thank god. i just going to complain about that. i was seeing thread from the early 2000s and was like wat is happening.

 

[Lady Error]

when are avatars going to be fixed? Eyestabber has a black box in his avatar and Parabalus has a white bar in his too

The avatars with transparent backgrounds used to be all PNG or GIF, but are now all JPG for some reason. Did XF2 convert them all during the transfer?

 

[Jonathan "Zee Nekomimi]

mine still a png. At least transparency wise.

 

[Lady Error]

mine still a png. At least transparency wise.

The ones that have broken transparency are all JPG now:

 

[Lady Error]

Just saw this:

 

[Jonathan "Zee Nekomimi]

Just saw this:

View attachment 26279

last topic there is by infinitron and last post by roguey. It's the warhammer 40k rogue trade topic.

 

[Demo.Graph]

The "parrot" and "excited" are missing.

 

[Hag]

The "parrot" and "excited" are missing.

Yeah, same thing here, but only on Pale Moon and not on Vivaldi.

 

[Twiglard]

The "parrot" and "excited" are missing.

Yeah, same thing here, but only on Pale Moon and not on Vivaldi.

Fix it and send the modified css. I can't be arsed to test on anything else than Firefox and Edge/Chromium.

 

[Hag]

Fix it and send the modified css. I can't be arsed to test on anything else than Firefox and Edge/Chromium.

For the excited : in .sv-rating-type-icon--sprite27
background: none !important -> background: none
For the parrot : same but for .sv-rating-type-icon--sprite22

WTH are those "important" needed for anyway ?

 

[Twiglard]

For the excited : in .sv-rating-type-icon--sprite27
background: none !important -> background: none
For the parrot : same but for .sv-rating-type-icon--sprite22

This should work though:

content: url('/forums/styles/dark/ratings/rating_bounce.gif');

I thought it was the negative margins that aren't rendered correctly. But this simply means that your browser is broken.

WTH are those "important" needed for anyway ?

Overriding more specific selectors.

 

[Hag]

This should work though:

content: url('/forums/styles/dark/ratings/rating_bounce.gif');

I thought it was the negative margins that aren't rendered correctly. But this simply means that your browser is broken.

The content rule is indeed applied.
The dancing donut is ok by the way and its CSS is much cleaner (no content nor background rules). Could it be possible to adapt it for the parrot and the excited guy ?

 

[Twiglard]

The dancing donut is ok by the way and its CSS is much cleaner (no content nor background rules). Could it be possible to adapt it ?

If you can get an admin to fix it, sure.

 

[Hag]

Taluntain
Can you quickly fix the CSS rules of the parrot and the excited guy to have it similar to the dancing donut one ? They are broken on some browsers (see posts above).

 

[Twiglard]

Hag, Demo.Graph: rating sprite sheets have been disabled with extreme prejudice. This also reduces the amount of CSS fixups by a lot. You should now see the ratings.

Everyone else: ratings now may be broken in some new unexpected ways. Report such cases.

 

[Demo.Graph]

Hag, Demo.Graph: rating sprite sheets have been disabled with extreme prejudice. This also reduces the amount of CSS fixups by a lot. You should now see the ratings.

I do. Thanks.
BTW, I'm on Firefox 95.0.2, it's only about 7 months old.