Apostle Hand
Death Knight
I've been waiting for this game 10 years. It looks great.
Why do you hate it Ontopoly?
Why do you hate it Ontopoly?
So 10 years ago when you fell in love with Baldurs Gate this is what you imagined it to be? You probably had a much different picture in your head. It would make more sense if you said you have been waiting for this game for 5 years after you finished dos2.I've been waiting for this game 10 years. It looks great.
Why do you hate it Ontopoly?
Which begs the question:You think BG3 will be as good as GOAT FNV? I wouldn't go that far...
Uhm...He touched me where it really hurts. He broke my heart.
Why don't we have a thread like this but for a 10 year old game? Someone show me a 10 year old thread please. Maybe if I liked guns I would be upset about fonv but I hate guns and don't like fallout so I'm not going to make a thread about it. Btw people actually were upset about fallout going 3d and tossing a bunch of rpg out with itCould someone point me towards those FO:NV hate megathreads with people bitching that it's just FO3:2, has nothing in common with originals (3D FPP instead of iso, RTWG* instead TB) and that the mechanics is (that time actually true) decline from FO1&2?
Or is it just that we don't have those threads for FO:NV, with the sole reason we do have them for BG3 being that BG fans, and RTWP fans specifically, are whiny turds?
If I'd been on the forum when it was released, rest assured I would've started one.Could someone point me towards those FO:NV hate megathreads with people bitching that it's just FO3:2, has nothing in common with originals (3D FPP instead of iso, RTWG* instead TB) and that the mechanics is (that time actually true) decline from FO1&2?
Which begs the question:
Could someone point me towards those FO:NV hate megathreads with people bitching that it's just FO3:2, has nothing in common with originals (3D FPP instead of iso, RTWG* instead TB) and that the mechanics is (that time actually true) decline from FO1&2?
Or is it just that we don't have those threads for FO:NV, with the sole reason we do have them for BG3 being that BG fans, and RTWP fans specifically, are whiny turds?
Uhm...
Heart is tad higher, I think.
The style of dialogue options
Yeah, it does seem basic. Very DAI-like. What I meant is we wont get talking lobsters and cat quest-givers.
I hope they let you keep gnomes as petsThe style of dialogue options
Yeah, it does seem basic. Very DAI-like. What I meant is we wont get talking lobsters and cat quest-givers.
Swen confirmed, in post-stream interview, that there will be pets in the camp and interaction with animals in the wild. To what extent? don't know
I hope they let you keep gnomes as petsThe style of dialogue options
Yeah, it does seem basic. Very DAI-like. What I meant is we wont get talking lobsters and cat quest-givers.
Swen confirmed, in post-stream interview, that there will be pets in the camp and interaction with animals in the wild. To what extent? don't know
Stop. You're embarrassing meI'm hoping to have you as a pet in my camp
After the malformed abomination that was F3, FNV looks like a godsend.Or is it just that we don't have those threads for FO:NV
Is this the new Furry Codex Thread?Stop. You're embarrassing meI'm hoping to have you as a pet in my camp
Which begs the question:You think BG3 will be as good as GOAT FNV? I wouldn't go that far...
Could someone point me towards those FO:NV hate megathreads with people bitching that it's just FO3:2, has nothing in common with originals (3D FPP instead of iso, RTWG* instead TB) and that the mechanics is (that time actually true) decline from FO1&2?
Or is it just that we don't have those threads for FO:NV, with the sole reason we do have them for BG3 being that BG fans, and RTWP fans specifically, are whiny turds?
Real Time With Gimmick
Uhm...He touched me where it really hurts. He broke my heart.
Heart is tad higher, I think.
Generally speaking, the ones needing it won't be playing and those who will won't need it.Can someone make a mod for bg3 when it comes out that removes the Baldur's Gate title? Just change the name to something else
But maybe it would be a strong message to cunt face swen. Modders are going to have to fix half his game, why not the most important flaw?Generally speaking, the ones needing it won't be playing and those who will won't need it.Can someone make a mod for bg3 when it comes out that removes the Baldur's Gate title? Just change the name to something else
It would indeed be a prestigious endeavor.But maybe it would be a strong message to cunt face swen. Modders are going to have to fix half his game, why not the most important flaw?Generally speaking, the ones needing it won't be playing and those who will won't need it.Can someone make a mod for bg3 when it comes out that removes the Baldur's Gate title? Just change the name to something else
Stop. You're embarrassing meI'm hoping to have you as a pet in my camp
So the game that isn't formally a sequel but inherits most of its, so called "DNA" from genuine rapesequel of legendary predecessors, being effectively a glorified expansion to said rapesequel is ok even if it doesn't look anything like originals and the new mechanics is mostly decline and gimmickry, and game that is technically a sequel of an overhyped so-so game, and inherits some of its looks and actual mechanical innovations from a game that was not part of the series is... not... because? Uhh... I could use some help here?After the malformed abomination that was F3, FNV looks like a godsend.Or is it just that we don't have those threads for FO:NV
Because Vegas is genuine improvement compared to F3. As flawed as Vegas is it has it's own good moments and nowhere near as awful as F3, which is a big selling point in itself. After someone suffocates you with plastic bag in the basement, but you struggle out of it, you don't complain that air is stale and moist. It's air, and it's better than plastic bag.So the game that isn't formally a sequel but inherits most of its, so called "DNA" from genuine rapesequel of legendary predecessors, being effectively a glorified expansion to said rapesequel is ok even if it doesn't look anything like originals and the new mechanics is mostly decline and gimmickry, and game that is technically a sequel of an overhyped so-so game, and inherits some of its looks and actual mechanical innovations from a game that was not part of the series is... not... because? Uhh... I could use some help here?