Putting the 'role' back in role-playing games since 2002.
Donate to Codex
Good Old Games
  • Welcome to rpgcodex.net, a site dedicated to discussing computer based role-playing games in a free and open fashion. We're less strict than other forums, but please refer to the rules.

    "This message is awaiting moderator approval": All new users must pass through our moderation queue before they will be able to post normally. Until your account has "passed" your posts will only be visible to yourself (and moderators) until they are approved. Give us a week to get around to approving / deleting / ignoring your mundane opinion on crap before hassling us about it. Once you have passed the moderation period (think of it as a test), you will be able to post normally, just like all the other retards.

Incline Warhammer 40,000 Lore Thread

Louis_Cypher

Arcane
Joined
Jan 1, 2016
Messages
1,990
I didn't understand the appeal of the Dark Angels for the longest time, but when I finally got it, they clicked as an interesting Chapter. It's the same with some of the other themes; the Codex doesn't always get across their essence. It's not like say Star Trek, where it's very obvious what the Klingon Empire's appeal is, or the Romulan Star Empire's appeal and character. Rather a dry Codex description sometimes leaves one scratching their head...

Finally someone explained it like this:

First remember that not all traitor Chapters are Chaos worshippers, some are just "renegades".

The Cult Imperialis (Imperial Creed) and the Lex Imperialis (Imperial Law) say that: 1). Traitors cannot be forgiven, under any circumstances. To forgive a traitor is Heresy. 2). Heretics can be forgiven, but it requires the heretic's death and confession. This is an important distinction in Imperial dogma. The Dark Angels offer forgiveness to The Fallen (seeing them as having been misled), torturing them to death to extract confession (The Fallen are traitors but ones that are seen as having comitted Treason separately to Horus due to misinformation). The Dark Angels are thus forgiving Treason, comitting themselves the slightly lesser crime of Heresy in the process. Thus the Dark Angels are guilty of the crime of 'Heresy', and if known it would require the entire Dark Angels Chapter's confession and death. They feel it is their duty to offer redemption to The Fallen. Thus the Dark Angels must keep their Heresy secret, killing anyone who finds out, or be legally destroyed by the Imperium.
 

Big_poppa_pump

Literate
Joined
Oct 20, 2024
Messages
47
BTW, I dunno if this has been asked way back, but to all the thread's bros:

Q: What is your favourite Space Marine chapter personally, or if you have miniature, what Space Marine chapter do you play?

(Maybe the two are different?)

I like the Dark Angels, rampant secrecy to the point of paranoia, the knightly aesthetic. Salamanders come close from the lore of them being as noble as an SM can be usually, stuff like their keeping in touch with their families and living among their people
See the Dark Angel stuff is retarded lore still, all legions had traitors but they act like if they are found out its game over. Half the entire White Scar legion were going to pledge for Horus for instance and you do not see modern 40k white scars letting it live over them. However, I guess I am shortening things since the White Scar traitors were pretty much forgiven if they became suicide warriors for the loyalists and they died as loyalists in the end.
 

Keshik

Arcane
Joined
Mar 22, 2012
Messages
2,227
BTW, I dunno if this has been asked way back, but to all the thread's bros:

Q: What is your favourite Space Marine chapter personally, or if you have miniature, what Space Marine chapter do you play?

(Maybe the two are different?)

I like the Dark Angels, rampant secrecy to the point of paranoia, the knightly aesthetic. Salamanders come close from the lore of them being as noble as an SM can be usually, stuff like their keeping in touch with their families and living among their people
See the Dark Angel stuff is retarded lore still, all legions had traitors but they act like if they are found out its game over. Half the entire White Scar legion were going to pledge for Horus for instance and you do not see modern 40k white scars letting it live over them. However, I guess I am shortening things since the White Scar traitors were pretty much forgiven if they became suicide warriors for the loyalists and they died as loyalists in the end.

Their fear of being seen as traitors making it more likely they are ones is sort of funny in a grimdark way. I should get the new books on the Lion's return. Although I guess how he deals with the legion (because they are really are one still) will be later.
 

BrotherFrank

Nouveau Riche
Patron
Joined
Apr 19, 2012
Messages
1,804
Favorite sm chapter: Blood Angels or Imperial Fists. Marines Malevolent as a surprise 3rd choice.

I'm going to second that there was a time when it was Blood Angels being pushed as the poster boys more then ultramarines, it sure was the case when i got into 40k at least.
I preferred the blue and yellow color scheme of the ultras but after reading through the lore books, blood angels had a lot more going on for them then anyone else at the time.
Hell they would actually end up giving some of their selling points to other chapters (notably the being nicest chapter schtick) and no one even noticed because blood angels have so many themes in them to begin with (whereas if you took away wolf wolf wolf from space wolves or the roman vibe from the ultras, wtf do you have left?).
Blood Angels could ditch the vampire stuff completely and still have lots to fallback on.

Then throw in what was for me the best special characters (tycho and his phantom of the opera mask, corbulo brandishing the grail, mephiston being edgy vamp or dante with his D:< golden face) and it wasn't even close compared to what other chapters at the time got.

Over the years though, popular perception and memes have warmed me to the Imperial Fists as the most autistic of mainstream sm chapters. And tbh i do prefer defensive actions over the blood angels close combat centric approach. Had the Imperial Fists been more fleshed out in 2nd edition it's likely i'd have gone for them instead of BA, but well, such is life. But yeah i like the idea of autistic builder sm who beef with iron warriors over who can build things better.



Marines Malevolent as I like them as an antidote to the trend of seemingly every sm chapter being nice guys now so it's no longer special anymore.
It's also a counter effect of so many normies getting into 40k and now getting into arguments about "good guys" in 40k and then they will inevitably clutch their pearls about marines malevolent. This makes me like them, they are like Rogue Trader marines that got lost in 40k and newbies hate them for it.

They got an underdog appeal to them too because everyone roots for them to go heretical or suffer an ignoble fate because wow those guys are such meanies!
Yet fact is they are a 2nd founding chapter who despite many inquisitorial investigations, never been been found guilty of any wrong doing and that is quite a feat, even most first founding chapters would not survive that kind of sustained close scrutiny.
I'm sure this will inevitably end when some tard writer decides to give the "fans" what they want and reveal the MM were traitors all along or some bs, but until then, i like these asshole space marines who dont give a damn how many civvies is in the path of their whirlwind barrage.

__adeptus_astartes_and_adeptus_mechanicus_warhammer_40k_drawn_by_ginjima__sample-484314829eec83ea602c8ccb313b73b9.jpg
 

Big_poppa_pump

Literate
Joined
Oct 20, 2024
Messages
47
Favorite sm chapter: Blood Angels or Imperial Fists. Marines Malevolent as a surprise 3rd choice.

I'm going to second that there was a time when it was Blood Angels being pushed as the poster boys more then ultramarines, it sure was the case when i got into 40k at least.
I preferred the blue and yellow color scheme of the ultras but after reading through the lore books, blood angels had a lot more going on for them then anyone else at the time.
Hell they would actually end up giving some of their selling points to other chapters (notably the being nicest chapter schtick) and no one even noticed because blood angels have so many themes in them to begin with (whereas if you took away wolf wolf wolf from space wolves or the roman vibe from the ultras, wtf do you have left?).
Blood Angels could ditch the vampire stuff completely and still have lots to fallback on.

Then throw in what was for me the best special characters (tycho and his phantom of the opera mask, corbulo brandishing the grail, mephiston being edgy vamp or dante with his D:< golden face) and it wasn't even close compared to what other chapters at the time got.

Over the years though, popular perception and memes have warmed me to the Imperial Fists as the most autistic of mainstream sm chapters. And tbh i do prefer defensive actions over the blood angels close combat centric approach. Had the Imperial Fists been more fleshed out in 2nd edition it's likely i'd have gone for them instead of BA, but well, such is life. But yeah i like the idea of autistic builder sm who beef with iron warriors over who can build things better.



Marines Malevolent as I like them as an antidote to the trend of seemingly every sm chapter being nice guys now so it's no longer special anymore.
It's also a counter effect of so many normies getting into 40k and now getting into arguments about "good guys" in 40k and then they will inevitably clutch their pearls about marines malevolent. This makes me like them, they are like Rogue Trader marines that got lost in 40k and newbies hate them for it.

They got an underdog appeal to them too because everyone roots for them to go heretical or suffer an ignoble fate because wow those guys are such meanies!
Yet fact is they are a 2nd founding chapter who despite many inquisitorial investigations, never been been found guilty of any wrong doing and that is quite a feat, even most first founding chapters would not survive that kind of sustained close scrutiny.
I'm sure this will inevitably end when some tard writer decides to give the "fans" what they want and reveal the MM were traitors all along or some bs, but until then, i like these asshole space marines who dont give a damn how many civvies is in the path of their whirlwind barrage.

__adeptus_astartes_and_adeptus_mechanicus_warhammer_40k_drawn_by_ginjima__sample-484314829eec83ea602c8ccb313b73b9.jpg

I highly doubt they would kill a chapter, they were confirmed with primaris marines and rarely do anything too crazy. Salamander/Lamenter fellating is reaching reddit levels of annoyance.

The Lamenters SHOULDNT be allowed to always be on the brink of destruction and still some how come back. I want to remind you they didnt show up at Baal to help during the Devastation. While everyone under the sun showed up even an old school chapter thought to have been lost the Flesh Eaters were able to show up. The Salamanders care for humans but even they wouldn't waste their lives in such useless martyr complex last stands. Just once id like a pragmatic chapter like the Mentors or Raptors call their attitude out why would you waste marines in trying to save already dying refugees? How much boys died in the process to even BECOME a marine? The minimum is at least 100 per marine and the Lamenters waste their numbers to willingly. It is also not like they are special the Raven Guard are known to specifically save slaves and cause slave revolts agasint xenos/chaos. They are not fellated over it that much compared to the Lamenters.
 

Big_poppa_pump

Literate
Joined
Oct 20, 2024
Messages
47
Does anyone here like Eldar? I have been taking a liking to the minor craftworld of Altansar or this place another majority imperium kills everything website?
 

RaggleFraggle

Ask me about VTM
Joined
Mar 23, 2022
Messages
1,438
Does anyone here like Eldar? I have been taking a liking to the minor craftworld of Altansar or this place another majority imperium kills everything website?
GW’s imperium (read: space marine) bias is why I am no longer a 40k fan. Unfortunately, there are zero alternatives
 

Big_poppa_pump

Literate
Joined
Oct 20, 2024
Messages
47
Does anyone here like Eldar? I have been taking a liking to the minor craftworld of Altansar or this place another majority imperium kills everything website?
GW’s imperium (read: space marine) bias is why I am no longer a 40k fan. Unfortunately, there are zero alternatives
Im all for blaming GW, however the fanbase is no help in pushing imperium bias. I only started posting here after years of putting it off due to the fact 4chan has become unbearable and 40k threads either treat eldar as "cocksleeves" or say they should be removed from 40k. It is all mostly the same guys I feel but its impossible to tell. GW is guilty for pushing imperial wank but its what makes money while also biting them in the ass if they are also so hellbent on selling new space marines 24/7 but also needing to say the imperium is evil.
 

Louis_Cypher

Arcane
Joined
Jan 1, 2016
Messages
1,990
I wouldn't have minded just painting those old figures, they were some of the best in White Dwarf.

Hell, even 1st Edition Rogue Trader's farseer was good looking:

bmR7cJF.jpeg


I like Eldar for their lore and unique aesthetic, and am probably a xenos guy. I just probably am not the most suited player to their style.
 

RaggleFraggle

Ask me about VTM
Joined
Mar 23, 2022
Messages
1,438
Does anyone here like Eldar? I have been taking a liking to the minor craftworld of Altansar or this place another majority imperium kills everything website?
GW’s imperium (read: space marine) bias is why I am no longer a 40k fan. Unfortunately, there are zero alternatives
Im all for blaming GW, however the fanbase is no help in pushing imperium bias. I only started posting here after years of putting it off due to the fact 4chan has become unbearable and 40k threads either treat eldar as "cocksleeves" or say they should be removed from 40k. It is all mostly the same guys I feel but its impossible to tell. GW is guilty for pushing imperial wank but its what makes money while also biting them in the ass if they are also so hellbent on selling new space marines 24/7 but also needing to say the imperium is evil.
Hence why I gave up. This cannot be fixed. Make new franchises with the benefit of hindsight.

I see basically two ways to avoid the problems that wrecked 40k.

1) make all (or at least most) of the civilizations human (or primarily human) to avoid the downside of most players’ humanocentric biases.

2) have a small number of civilizations. 3 or 4 max. This means you won’t have to split your attention too much and can dedicate more to these few you have, reducing the effects of favoritism.
 

Mangoose

Arcane
Patron
Joined
Apr 5, 2009
Messages
26,496
Location
I'm a Banana
Divinity: Original Sin Project: Eternity
Storyfag The crazy thing is that Space Marine 2 is that the development company, Saber Interactive, has at best only ported the Halo games to PC, and made World War Z.

Because the gameplay quality actually meets Space Marine 1. And Space Marine 1 is by Relic, who even if you ignore the 40k games... Space Marine 1 was developed using the Darksiders engine. Meaning Space Marnie was on the level of gameplay quality design as Darksiders, which ALREADY was totally famous.

Like I was scared Space Marine 2 was worse. Because I expected too much change. I was worried it went as far as pop-a-mole.

But Saber actually emulated Space Marine 1's combat system with Space Marine 2, instead of trying to make something new. That's imo a good design decision - to be fucking humble to something that is known to be good instead of gambling for new for the sake of new. TBH I don't even know if they changed that much, because a lot of the difference in gameplay is because fighting Tyranids is a different experience - different encounter - than fighting Orks. (For one, the Tyranids are fucking scary)
 

Louis_Cypher

Arcane
Joined
Jan 1, 2016
Messages
1,990
In all honesty the Eldar are cooler than the Imperium in many ways. I'm a sucker for things that have claim to being first, such as fallen once great empires. The Eldar were a great people. Sometimes the fandom jokes that they are xenophobic assholes, or deserved what they got, but it's a tragedy to see beauty or wisdom fall. I prefer them being portrayed as wise beings in tune with deeper realties. It is the Elven trope, and tropes exist for a reason.
 

BrotherFrank

Nouveau Riche
Patron
Joined
Apr 19, 2012
Messages
1,804










Come to think of it, i find it hilarious that Eldar are the 40k race that has barely changed since I got into 40k in the first place.
There's the Ynnead stuff and Gw's boneheaded attempt to combine all elf races into 1 but other then that, they are still the same old space elves even still using a lot of the same minis from 20 years ago.
 
Last edited:

Big_poppa_pump

Literate
Joined
Oct 20, 2024
Messages
47
I like the Space Elves but yeah GW does them no favors.










The issue is they actually don’t force writers apparently on stuff unless they need too. The White Scars only got books in Horus heresy since Chris Wraight asked why they didn’t get books and the reply he got was “your the first to ask want dibs?”
 

Caim

Arcane
Joined
Aug 1, 2013
Messages
17,413
Location
Dutchland
The issue is they actually don’t force writers apparently on stuff unless they need too. The White Scars only got books in Horus heresy since Chris Wraight asked why they didn’t get books and the reply he got was “your the first to ask want dibs?”
He then proceeded to elevate the White Scars from literally who tier to one of the most badass First Founding chapters.
 

Gandalf

Arbiter
Joined
Sep 1, 2020
Messages
763
Eldars were such big degenerates that their deeds spawned Slaansh. That's a huge minus. Those Xenos are scum, but I do like their overall designs and use of psionics.
 

As an Amazon Associate, rpgcodex.net earns from qualifying purchases.
Back
Top Bottom