KickStarter Phoenix Point - the new game from X-COM creator Julian Gollop

[Jaedar]

there's very little resources available, and only when the game says so

This is what raiding settlements is for. Minimal rep penalty, and you get a lot of resources.

totally unfeasible at start because you'd be crushed. totally unfeasible later on because you want to build reputation.
.

Nah. Raiding Anu at start is free money (what are they going to, rush me with their shit tier armor and shotguns/baseball bats?) and Jericho is fine until they invent mounted rocket launchers. Synedrion are tricky, but none of their weapons or armor are actually strong, so superior tactics will rule. Have to watch out for snipers though. Each raid will net you more than a thousand in total resources so you don't have to spam them, and the penalty for a single raid is only like -5. Do one raid for every defence/lair mission and you'll still find yourself increasing in rep, and you probably won't need that many.

Raiding does actually become a lot less feasible as the game goes on, as each faction gets hard to counter tech. Two shots (out of the three round burst) from a virus rifle will incapacitate one of your soldiers for half a dozen turns. Jericho gets rockets and heavy armor out the wazoo. Synedrion get instaparalysis tanks.

I think "the correct" way to play is to raid heavily early on and build a bunch of science/manufacturing/training/bases and only later on do the regular scavenging and exploration missions. You should especially never build aircraft, always steal them.

 

[Matalarata]

totally unfeasible at start because you'd be crushed.

Playing on veteran to get an hang of things and because I have very little time and I managed to steal a Synedrion aircraft with my 5 starting soldiers rank 3 + a random Synedrion (lol) sniper I hired while en-route. I cannot vouch for how the games holds together later on, but early raids are pretty doable. The mission was evalued "extreme" and indeed I faced many more foes than in my previous nest assault (also, enemy snipers) but I didn't lose a single soldier and even if I had lost two, I would have considered the raid successful.
Cherry on top was the rep hit, -6%. For slaughtering ten or so operatives and stealing a top-of-the-line piece of gear. I can see why you should never, ever pay for aircrafts but this is pure comedy from a realism standpoint. Not that I personally care about that, just find it hilarious.

 

[MadMaxHellfire]

so you're telling me i'm wrong in saying looting missions are hard because you totally did an entirely different mission.
intreadasting.

 

[Parabalus]

there's very little resources available, and only when the game says so

This is what raiding settlements is for. Minimal rep penalty, and you get a lot of resources.

totally unfeasible at start because you'd be crushed. totally unfeasible later on because you want to build reputation.

You have too much rep later on as it is, a citadel gives you 3 free raiding missions. You'd have to go out of your way to not end up 100/100/100.

 

[prengle]

phoenix point more like... penis point B-)

 

[Matalarata]

intreadasting.

"Intredasting" is your reaction to a simple statement of facts. Raid missions are raid, oh knoweledgeable one. You fight the same kind of enemies, if you raid or steal. Stealing aircrafts is debatably harder since you also have to hold position for 4-5 turns. Have you even played the game? To answer your inane question, no I also performed two proper raid, after I posted my message, see above for my evaluation.

Methinks you simply ignored that portion of the game and performed sub-par but hey, what do I know, right? Intredasting my ass.

 

[MadMaxHellfire]

aircraft missions are "walk a man there, walking back optional". resources missions are "walk there which is in multiple points all very far, pick up stuff, have enough strength to bring stuff back, if you can't get back everything is lost".
if you can't see the MONSTRUOUSLY GIGANTIC difference, you're a living chromosomes dispenser.

 

[Matalarata]

Wow, even when confronted with evidence that you're the only one itt that didn't manage an early raid and defined them as:

totally unfeasible at start because you'd be crushed

you prefer to call other people names. That... really tells a lot about you.

walk there which is in multiple points all very far

Lol.

pick up stuff

1AP

have enough strength to bring stuff back

Bad build? The importance of strength has already been emphatized before. Your point? Also, the more you know, overloading soldiers only gives them -moves. Heavies can jump far (with no overload penalties, mind you), loot crates and pass items to other soldiers and you can literally exit the map with people 5-7 point over their carry capacity. I know because I did it, pretty easy too. Finally, cherry on top, you can just pick up what you really need and avoid overloading. Even a partial raid nets a lot of resources, again have you even tried it?

if you can't get back everything is lost

Git gud?

I repeat, having to hold position for 4 turns is far worse. If any of the above gave you any problem or is what you consider "unfeasible", it's your chromosomes that have some problems holding together. Lol, imagine playing JA blind.

 

[MadMaxHellfire]

you have devastating comprehension issues. i have no use for you.

 

[Matalarata]

Yes, I never understood people making excuses for their own shortcomings. Bye.

 

[Grotesque]

so in this game, the exploring airship still autorefills with fuel an any interest points on the map?

 

[razvedchiki]

manual refuelling was too much for the target audience.

 

[Parabalus]

manual refuelling was too much for the target audience.

How did that work? You had to buy/steal/scavenge fuel at every site you currently just bounce off of?

Sounds fun while you have just one aircraft, afterwards not so much.

 

[MadMaxHellfire]

instead of any site automatically refuelling in an instant your aircrafts, it worked only on bases. maybe allied outposts too, can't remember.
anyway, geoscape sucks, they know it, that's why we can't chose where the first base is.

 

[prengle]

manual refuelling was too much for the target audience.

the same target audience that happily micromanaged their ship's inventory and weapons and so on in x-com? hot damn, i sure do love the games industry

 

[PanteraNera]

In Backer Build 3 it worked like this:
Every aircraft had a limited amount of fuel.
You had to move back to Base to refuel.
You could build refueling points on friendly haven's for like 60 materials. If the haven was destroyed or you pissed them off (going below neutral I think) the refueling point was gone.
If you had not enough fuel to get back to a base or refueling point you had to do an emergency refuel which costed something like 40 materials.

I really liked the system a lot more than what they finally went with, as it added more strategy to the geoscape (diplomacy, pandoran attacks, resource managment).

 

[Parabalus]

In Backer Build 3 it worked like this:
Every aircraft had a limited amount of fuel.
You had to move back to Base to refuel.
You could build refueling points on friendly haven's for like 60 materials. If the haven was destroyed or you pissed them off (going below neutral I think) the refueling point was gone.
If you had not enough fuel to get back to a base or refueling point you had to do an emergency refuel which costed something like 40 materials.

I really liked the system a lot more than what they finally went with, as it added more strategy to the geoscape (diplomacy, pandoran attacks, resource managment).

Seems like a lot of busywork for no real gain if it was that simple to get fuel. I'm not surprised they cut it entirely.
Explains why the blimp sucks so much now though, since it's biggest advantage was removed.

If it was both a 7th resource and you had to store it on your aircraft it would be way better, especially if you were able to customize the aircraft's loadout.

manual refuelling was too much for the target audience.

the same target audience that happily micromanaged their ship's inventory and weapons and so on in x-com? hot damn, i sure do love the games industry

That's really puzzling in game, since you have multiple teams and aircraft, but their gear can freely teleport between them. Pretty much the only thing preventing that is that it's extremely tedious.

 

[robinox]

Both games share essentially the same fundamental flaws. They just differ in production values and polish. They are both a waste of time and clearly far worse than tactics games of the 90s. I am still waiting for a developer who can match (not even exceed) Xcom Apocalypse, i am not sure i will even see it in my life time at this point.

I sadly agree.

 

[Infinitron]

Phoenix Point may seem familiar to those who’ve played turn-based tactical strategy games, but there are a lot of differences in how you play the game. Let us walk you through them before your first time playing!

 

[Taka-Haradin puolipeikko]

Was ability to build independent ammo patched in?

Spoiler

 

[razvedchiki]

nope, it appears at the screen but you cant actually manufacture it.

 

[Taka-Haradin puolipeikko]

nope, it appears at the screen but you cant actually manufacture it.

Funniest thing about this is that production costs for those items are visible, but there's simply no way to make them.

 

[cw8]

Is the game good? I'm a backer so I have the GOG copy but haven't found time to play it yet.

 

[Jaedar]

Is the game good? I'm a backer so I have the GOG copy but haven't found time to play it yet.

It is ok. Your expectations should be slightly lower than x-com apocalypse.

 

[ArchAngel]

nope, it appears at the screen but you cant actually manufacture it.

Funniest thing about this is that production costs for those items are visible, but there's simply no way to make them.

to make ammo you need to first reverse engineer the weapon