So, I was interviewed 2 days ago for a TV broadcast by a reporter who knew what questions to ask. He totally bulldozed me and I really was at a loss for words, and here is why - I was warned beforehand that I shouldn't use words that are too technical or concepts that can be taken out of context without having read the entire continental philosophy. The reason for this is that it was for the ...let's say general population. The problem is that the questions were so precise and calculated that I really couldn't begin explaining what I wanted using simple words and sentences. I did everything I could though with what I had, but it mostly came out weak. On the other hand, even if I could use a more advanced language and knowledge base, I still couldn't explain it in the time frame that I had. This might explain why interviewers don't ask the hard questions, even if they do know what and how to ask them. This does tie to my previous statement that you can't really go into too much detail in an interview (be it lack of time or target audience). I still think they can skip the usual drivel at the start though. The lack of time part bothers me, because I've seen interviews with MCA that last like 1 hour+ and it's still the same old triviality.